Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Nomination Logjam Causes Dilemma for D.C. (all nominees expire January 3rd)
rollcall.com ^ | 9/18/14 | Hannah Hess

Posted on 09/19/2014 5:51:17 AM PDT by cotton1706

With the flow of judicial nominations slowing to a trickle this summer, District of Columbia officials are becoming increasingly concerned about the effect on the local bench.

Chief Judge Lee F. Satterfield last week wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid describing the “adverse impact” of the backlog. Facing three judicial vacancies on the D.C. Superior Court, and a fourth coming in November, Satterfield requested votes on pending nominations before Congress adjourns.

The Nevada Democrat’s office has not responded formally to the Sept. 10 letter, according to Leah H. Gurowitz, director of governmental affairs and public relations for the court. Despite the correspondence, first reported by Legal Times, the chamber appears poised to adjourn without considering the nominations. Reid’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the situation.

Under the District’s unique status, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, not the Judiciary Committee, has to conduct confirmation hearings on federal judges nominated by the president to be confirmed by the Senate, who have exclusively local purview for the courts of D.C.

Two of the local nominees — Steven M. Wellner and William W. Nooter — sailed through the committee earlier this year, while Sherry Moore Trafford’s nomination has not been voted on since her appearance before a subcommittee on March 27.

A committee aide told CQ Roll Call that Trafford is still under consideration and Chairman Thomas R. Carper, D-Del., hopes to move forward on her nomination after Congress returns.

The busy, urban court has 62 judges when fully staffed. They handle more than 100,000 cases per year.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/19/2014 5:51:17 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Good. Maybe fewer judges will result in fewer leftists being appointed by the congressional fools.


2 posted on 09/19/2014 6:08:17 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Considering that Reid changed the rules so Obama’s Marxists in robes can get on the court with only 15 Dem Senators votes Dems have no-one to point to but themselves for this.


3 posted on 09/19/2014 6:33:28 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Chief Judge Lee F. Satterfield, appointed by H.W. Bush.

http://judgepedia.org/Lee_F._Satterfield


4 posted on 09/19/2014 7:43:49 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson