Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armored Tank [sic], Grenade Launchers At Disposal Of LAUSD Police Force
CBSLA.com) ^ | September 15, 2014 6:31 PM

Posted on 09/15/2014 8:21:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Los Angeles Unified School District Police officials are considering whether they need the armored vehicle and grenade launchers they received from the U.S. military.

The military hardware at the disposal of LAUSD police officers includes a 20-foot-long, 14-ton armored transport vehicles, much like the ones used to move Marines in Iraqi combat zones. The tank is worth $733,000 and the school district’s police force got it from the government for free.

How would LAUSD use such a vehicle?

“For us? That vehicle would be used for extraordinary circumstances,” LAUSD Police Chief Steve Zipperman said.

The tank, which is stored at a secret location, has been in the department’s possession since July.

“It’s something that we believe is a life-saving vehicle,” Zipperman said. “And certainly we realize we need to take a look, is this the best alternative right now for us until we find something else that is more conductive to a police-type of rescue.”

The district is also in possession of grenade launchers, which it received for free from the military after 9/11. Neither the tank, nor the grenade launchers, have ever been used. But the district doesn’t plan on keeping them.

“It’s a piece of equipment that’s not essential for our mission, so we will be disposing of those,” Zipperman said.

The armored vehicles and heavy artillery [???] distributed to local agencies became a national issue in the wake of the riots in Ferguson, Mo.

“I can’t allow whatever political ramifications or analysis in Ferguson suggest how I want to make a decision on how to best make sure we respond at the LAUSD,” Zipperman said.

The chief says the tank will stay, but will only be deployed on his direct orders with the approval of the school superintendent.

“To suggest that it’s a threatening type of equipment or equipment for a show of force – that is not the case,” Zipperman said.


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Which PD got the 155 howitzers?
1 posted on 09/15/2014 8:21:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I doubt if there is a law enforcement agency in this country that actually has a tank.


2 posted on 09/15/2014 8:25:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; 2ndDivisionVet

I was afraid this would happen. Now we will have an arms race among all the school districts. It will never end.


3 posted on 09/15/2014 8:27:52 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
When the USAF finally lets go of the A-10, how many school districts, park rangers and parking patrols will get them?

Nothing says "No Parking" like a burst of 30 mm armor piercing rounds.

4 posted on 09/15/2014 8:27:54 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin


5 posted on 09/15/2014 8:28:04 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If it’s free, does that mean they should take it? No. Just because it’s free doesn’t mean a police force needs it.


6 posted on 09/15/2014 8:28:06 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

LOL!!!


7 posted on 09/15/2014 8:29:27 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chode

There are a lot of good arms in that crowd — sign ‘em up!


8 posted on 09/15/2014 8:29:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I doubt if there is a law enforcement agency in this country that actually has a tank."

I suspect that is due more to lack of funds than lack of desire. LE didn't hesitate one bit to use Bradleys and CEVs at Waco when Wesley Clark offered them up. If they'd put up a single Abrams on the 1033 program, I'm guessing no shortage of agencies would be competing for it.

9 posted on 09/15/2014 8:31:25 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The SWAT team is passé; now, PDs can go for a full blitzkrieg.


10 posted on 09/15/2014 8:31:50 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Chode

I feel bad for that crew. A tank trap consisting of a couple dozen gallons of gasoline plus kerosine combined with about 30 molotov ingniters....Shudder...thankfully I’m retured. I’d hate to be stuck in a IFV under those circumstnces.


12 posted on 09/15/2014 8:38:58 PM PDT by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Not tanks, FRiend.


13 posted on 09/15/2014 8:39:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

bent metal plate and about 1/4 pound of C4 into the side of that and you’d think a bowling ball hit the head pin.


14 posted on 09/15/2014 8:41:17 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
We aren’t going to be able to stop the proliferation of the military weapons to local police forces.

It’s important, however, to change those things we can, and in this case one thing to change is our perception of those weapons.

We need to begin thinking of them as resources for our side, resources being maintained and fueled for us to use when they are needed.

15 posted on 09/15/2014 8:41:49 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Bipartisan political folks would probably like to have those weapons for defending their offices against the Ebola virus, against the unworthy in general and defend their incomes from the austerity layoffs ahead (debt collapse). They have the political influence and legal immunity to have and do whatever they like for now. If they arm-up enough, they might try to enforce a continuation of the situation.

Leviathan (Uncle Sam employs more people than you think)
National Review ^ | 02/03/2011 | Iain Murray
"...nearly 40 million Americans employed in some way by government."

Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php
American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,949,129 [Democrat] 81% [Republican] 1%”


16 posted on 09/15/2014 8:42:38 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
“To suggest that it’s a threatening type of equipment or equipment for a show of force – that is not the case,” Zipperman said.


Since the other alternative is that they actually think they have a use for it; that is less than reassuring.
17 posted on 09/15/2014 9:05:19 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
be used for extraordinary circumstances,

like when they declare ML - their 'equipment is already dispersed and in place around the country, ready for them to commandeer and control

'Vet" you say I doubt if there is a law enforcement agency in this country that actually has a tank.

heavy duty war vehicles have been systematically and with great malice aforethought 'delivered' across the country - particularly in smaller law enforcement outfits surrounding larger cities...still belong to the gov't should they 'need' them.

this has been going on for years, in the open in and in peoples faces. There's one team of 4 drivers that have been delivering MRAPs - full time - for over two years now. That's just one team.

Lots more info re the tanks - do some research. When they get ready to lower the boom - everything is in place. Anyone who thinks they'll be able to head for the hills at the first hint of trouble - out of ANY sizable city or along any major or semi-major roads, have their heads in the sand.

copy paste to read links

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/15/san-diego-school-takes-mrap-store-medical-supplies/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Front-TheWashingtonTimesAmericasNewspaper+%28Front+Page+-+The+Washington+Times%29

...

...

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140914/jsp/foreign/story_18833896.jsp#.VBez91duW3M

..

Now that this is FINALLY getting some publicity in our own media - Washington is 'rethinking it' - uh huh. Of they can. They've already got them all over now, HUNDREDS - ready to use.

..

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/09/pentagon-will-rethink-giving-mraps-bayonets-to-police-official-says

18 posted on 09/15/2014 9:12:27 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
We aren’t going to be able to stop the proliferation of the military weapons to local police forces. It’s important, however, to change those things we can, and in this case one thing to change is our perception of those weapons. We need to begin thinking of them as resources for our side, resources being maintained and fueled for us to use when they are needed.

Shall we suck on lollipops too?

I don't think you're clear on the difference between the police and the military.

You know there's a difference, right?

19 posted on 09/15/2014 9:18:54 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

He meant tanks, not armored cars, where are the “tanks”?


20 posted on 09/15/2014 9:24:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson