I refer you to my recent post. The DM is notorious for leaving all the details out of the story. Many a DM story turns out to be untrue or more complex than the headline/initial story.
Like any media outlet I am sure the DM makes errors. On the other hand in this story they report:
1. A woman confronted the person who she says sexually abused her.
2. Some called the cops who cam to the scene.
3. The woman was arrested for racial insensitive assault disturbing the public order.
4. She was released on police bond.
5. After she was arrested the police figure out that she had reported her abuse to another agency and they had been seeking to talk to her.
So what parts of this story are suspect to you? Certainly 3 and 4 are surely a matter public record in the UK 2 could certainly be police making up a reason ex post, but why would the DM make it up?
Certainly the woman could have been causing bodily harm to the guy in which case the police had to step in. The DM missed that aspect if so.
Undoubtedly most news is shaded by the media to effect a desired outcome among readers.
However, the sheer number of girls who were trafficked by muslims and the lack of investigation and policing makes this article believable. The callousness of those whose duty it was to protect these vulnerable children is shocking.