“I don’t think the muzzies said ‘Sorry ‘Bout that’ for the 3000 civilians killed on 911/01. Kill them all.”
You probably know we had killed civilians in the Mid-East and elsewhere before 9/11, and had supported Israel and other states that had killed partly on our behalf. So the terrorists of 9/11 could’ve used your same logic, i.e. there weren’t any innocents, really. Our government perpetrates evil in our name, and if every Muslim, all one billion-plus if them, is guilty for the actions of evert other Muslim, be they next door or across the world, we aren’t you guilty of killing the uncounted masses of civilians killed in Iraq, Part II?
Either deliberately targeting civilians is terrorism or it isn’t. If it isn’t when we do it because we’re bigger, then we have no moral advantage. Either people who have nothing to do with murder but are somehow tied to the murderers—being fellow citizens, co-religionists, or whatever—are guilty or they aren’t. If we condemn Muslims in Indonesia, for instance, for the actions of some lawless militia somewhere in Syria and Iraq, or wherever, but excuse ourselves from complicity in the crimes of our own government, then we are hypocrites.
Muzzies have declared war on every civilized peoples for over 1400 years. I do not believe in giving quarter to any brigand, pirate or thief no matter who they say they are doing it for. If they don’t want to become (or act) civilized, the onus must be placed them. What is an innocent Muzzie by the way? I’ll tell: A terrorist that hasn’t come to bat, yet.