Posted on 09/12/2014 5:40:30 AM PDT by wagglebee
If Roe v. Wade were overturned tomorrow, we would celebrate, right? Well, yes, but not so fast. A fringe element of the pro-choice movement has always insisted that Roe, even though it legalized abortion in the United States, didn’t go far enough. You see, in his majority opinion in the fateful 1973 Supreme Court case, Justice Harry Blackmun established a number of criteria for legal abortion, among them the so-called “viability test.”
According to Blackmun, if a fetus lacks viability outside the womb, it also lacks a component of personhood, and therefore a right to life. In the years since Roe, of course, viability has become a moving target, advancing ever earlier in pregnancy as medical technology advances. Now babies have been successfully delivered as early as 23 weeks, showing just how arbitrary the Court’s viability test is.
All of this is why Wesley Smith, writing at First Things, foresees the possibility of a “reverse reversal” of Roe v. Wade—that the pro-choice movement, not the pro-life movement, might ultimately discard Roe in favor of a more sweeping endorsement of abortion. Such a move, warns Smith, would effectively make abortion rights “absolute.”
And a recent shift in rhetoric hints that abortion advocates may be moving in this direction. Writing in The New York Times, Jackie Calmes writes that the days of “pro-choice,” as a label, are numbered, because “the term pro-choice. . . does not reflect the range of women’s health and economic issues now being debated. Nor…does it speak to a new generation of women.”
It turns out that the “pro-life” label, which focuses attention on the humanity of the unborn, has convinced a majority of Americans to identify themselves as pro-life.
“Very slowly,” writes Smith, “the fundamental premise of pro-life advocacy—that abortion not only stills a beating heart, but takes a human life—has resonated with the American public.”
But if it seems like advocates of legal abortion are in retreat, Smith warns that it may be only a strategic retreat.
“Rather than moderating,” he writes, “activists have embraced an advocacy model they once eschewed—being explicitly pro-abortion. In this new approach, Roe v. Wade is no longer a moment to celebrate. Rather, it must be overturned because it is too restrictive of what they believe should be an absolute right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, at any time, for any reason.”
And the nation’s number one provider of abortions, Planned Parenthood, is leading this retrenchment.
Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, says, “[This change] is something we’re been talking about for several years.” The absolute right to abortion, she believes, should be the pro-choice movement’s new rallying cry.
And recent legal successes by pro-lifers have inspired frightening honesty from her side. In a bone-chilling article in The Washington Post, Janet Harris urges readers to “Stop Calling Abortion a Difficult Decision.”
She argues, “When the pro-choice community frames abortion as a difficult decision . . . It is a tacit acknowledgment that terminating a pregnancy is a moral issue requiring an ethical debate. To say that deciding to have an abortion is a ‘hard choice’ implies a debate about whether the fetus should live, thereby endowing it with a status of being.”
So gone are the days of “safe, legal and rare” rhetoric about abortion. No more sheep’s clothing; the pro-choice movement is rapidly becoming an unapologetic pro-abortion movement. And so pro-lifers, especially Christians, have to be ready with gentle but firm conviction—and a renewed commitment to the sacred and precious dignity of every human person.
And as crazy as it may sound, there’s a bright side to this. Increasingly, abortion is being exposed. It’s no longer the hidden evil it once was. Hidden evil flourishes, but by exposing assaults on human dignity the church has historically offered the culture around them the very good gift of life and human flourishing. And we can do the same today.
Reprinted with permission from BreakPoint.org.
Five years of Obama has emboldened Big Murder to the point that they no longer even want to disguise their bloodlust.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
The more this crap goes on, the less I see abortion advocates as human. They are either demon-possessed or just plain monstrous.
Baby Murder, Inc.
Someday, we’ll invent an artificial womb that can nurture a child from the earliest stages of conception. At that point, it’s going to be pretty hard for the abortion advocates to come off as anything but bloodthirsty.
The truly nauseating thing is that they're *all too* human...as was Stalin...Mao...Hitler...Tiller The Killer...and as is Obama...Reid...
HadAborts / ProAborts = .99
At the very least I think those examples come under “monsters.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.