Have you read the article at the top of this thread? The ICR claims that the study disproves evolution. It does not. That's not my claim, that's the claim of the author.
Again, also, your response to the mole rat link was a canned pre-packaged response.
Of course it is. It's not as if you came up with a novel argument so why should I waste time producing a novel response?
And again, stop freaking out over your religious beliefs. It doesn’t disprove your god, evolution.
I'm going to just point out for the record that in sentence #1 you say that evolution isn't a religion and in sentence #6 you say that it is. How can I possibly follow along when you're not making any sense? I'll also note that it's funny that the worst insult that you creationists can apparently come up with is calling science "religion."
I’m saying you take evolution as a religion.
“ICR claims that the study disproves evolution”.
They always say that.
You somehow take it seriously and are bothered by it.
I think it is because of your adherence to evolution as a religion to you and you are overtly sensitive.
Thanks also for admitting you simply pass out tracts from your co-religionist proselytizers in response to questions.
Consistent with your inability to discuss or understand the topic.
ICR may be wrong about things, but they understand evolution and biology better than you.