Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan
Read the article http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/7/1707.full If you can.

I can. What's your point? It describes the genome of the species in question. What in it disproves evolution? The authors make no such claim.

Evolutionary theory should be predictive of many genomic structures yet to be rigorously determined.

Huh?

Can you proved references to any predictions on what we will find, based on evolutionary theory?

Sure, try this for starters http://ncse.com/rncse/17/4/predictive-power-evolutionary-biology-discovery-eusociality

13 posted on 09/11/2014 2:49:02 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker

Again, evolution is not a religion, you don’t need to be so defensive and think any discussion of the theory is an attempt to disprove it.

Again, also, your response to the mole rat link was a canned pre-packaged response.

That and your huh clearly show you do not even understand the question.

Read the part about telomere binding proteins. You’ll note it contradicts an earlier statement you made about the more phenotypically similar being most genotypical similar.

And again, stop freaking out over your religious beliefs. It doesn’t disprove your god, evolution.


14 posted on 09/11/2014 4:08:22 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson