To: rktman
If they had stuck with the global cooling strategy that they had from the early 90’s....people would have found it easier to accept and believe. By flipping twice since....it’s a joke strategy.
To: pepsionice
It feels like 45 degrees here this morning...
To: pepsionice
The one thing that your avg sheeperal can’t answer is
why is it that the same solutions were offered when we faced an ice age as when we faced “global warming”?
IE, reduced American lifestyle, increased taxes, more government control, less individual freedom...
7 posted on
09/11/2014 6:38:37 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: pepsionice
The point is that while the warmists are frantically seeking ways to fix their guesses, it is quite possible that what they are really missing are natural processes that mitigate the impact of CO2 in the atmosphere. Its not science to simply assume that when a guess is wrong that the predictions of the guess are right but we need to change the guess to explain why the predictions are right. Thats blind faith not science. We need to keep investigating, but as of now the warmists have absolutely no credible scientific basis for their climate projections of continued warming.It's not the 'flipping' part of the con that's the problem... it's that con artists are pretending they're scientists...
18 posted on
09/11/2014 8:38:42 AM PDT by
GOPJ
("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson