Posted on 09/09/2014 11:02:02 AM PDT by Rummyfan
There are always lunatics lurking in the crevices of Muslim politics prepared to proclaim a new caliphate; there isnt always a recruiting pool in the form of nearly 14 million displaced people (11 million Syrians, or half the countrys population, and 2.8 million Iraqis, or a tenth of the countrys population). When I wrote about the regions refugee disaster at Tablet in July (Between the Settlers and Unsettlers, the One State Solution is On Our Doorstep) the going estimate was only 10 million. A new UN study, though, claims that half of Syrians are displaced. Many of them will have nothing to go back to. When people have nothing to lose, they fight to the death and inflict horrors on others.
That is what civilizational decline looks like in real time. The roots of the crisis were visible four years ago before the so-called Arab Spring beguiled the foreign policy wonks. Hundreds of thousands of displaced Syrian farmers already were living in tent camps around Syrian cities before the Syrian civil war began in April 2011. Israeli analysts knew this. In March 2011 Paul Rivlin of Tel Aviv University released a study of the collapse of Syrian agriculture, widely cited in Arab media but unmentioned in the English language press (except my essay on the topic). Most of what passes for political science treats peoples and politicians as if they were so many pieces on a fixed game board. This time the game board is shrinking and the pieces are falling off.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
If true, then muzzles going to fight is a good thing. Let them go and die in this meatgrinder.
There are always lunatics lurking in the crevices of Muslim politics prepared to proclaim a new caliphate
During the Iraq war, I called Iraq “radical muslim flypaper”.
Islam is a Satanic inspired "religion."
That is all you need to know.
The present state of Syria & Lebanon is the consequence of, and the worst consequences ever, of a meddling western & Sunni-Middle East regime change agenda, creating even more of a fertile field for extremists than the failed regime change agenda that helped deliver the Taliban into power in Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Prior to the regime change agenda against Assad, we had regional security issues with Syria, BUT the security situation was fairly stable and containable; & there had not been any major Syria-Israel confrontations in a long time; & the Sunni-Shia sectarian strife in Iraq had not spread to Syria.
Israel had already taken out Assad’s nuclear ambition and Assad’s forces are no match for the very experienced and weapons-superior Israeli forces.
So who was after Assad? Who was he on the outs with? The Saudis and some of the shieks of he Gulf States. Why? Religiously he is an apostate to devout Sunnis. In areas of government Assad runs a secular regime, unlike the Saudis and the Gulf States, not even allowing Islam to be the “state religion” and allowing that a Syrian president does not have to be a Muslim. In the region, Assad made friends with the fundamentalist Shia theocrats of Iran instead of the radical fundamentalist Wahabi Sunni influenced heads of Saudi Arabia. Why? Why not? With the “Arab” and Sunni-dominant regimes NOT liking him much, which regional power was he going to make friends of. Is Assad a “good guy”? NO, surely not. But THAT is not why our so-called friends were involved in the regime change agenda against him.
The usage of that word has grown recently, but I recall seeing it discussed before 9/11/01. Probably in connection with the Sudan and the perpetual slaughter of Christians there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.