[thackney]

If doubling up shifts or hiring in massive amounts of manpower to get the job done early would help, I’d like to see it done.

And who do you think should pay for that?

You’d probably wind up spending about the same amount if you can keep it non-union.

Not a chance. If it was the same amount with a faster return, it would already be done that way.

[DoughtyOne]

Look Thackney, doubling up shifts means you pay guys on the second and third shift the same money, and the job gets done faster. You get people who need a job and agree to those terms.

Who would pay for it? The same people that would pay for it anyway, if the job took three times longer.