1 posted on
09/09/2014 6:07:16 AM PDT by
blam
To: blam
2 posted on
09/09/2014 6:10:36 AM PDT by
blam
(Jeff Sessions For President)
To: blam
Well, if the event is anticipated it is not by definition a black Swan event which must be unanticipated. Indeed it should be an "unknown unknown" in the parlance of Donald Rumsfeld.
However we label it, we conservatives should consider this in the context not just of economics but of geopolitics and domestic politics. If a black Swan occurs, or if one of these anticipated event occurs, it might be the catalyst needed to push theArticle V movement into the popular consciousness. It certainly will affect the next election.
3 posted on
09/09/2014 6:14:19 AM PDT by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: blam
The paragraph in the center under “70% potential” is not reflecting reality.
Sounds like it was written by Jack Lew.
4 posted on
09/09/2014 6:18:58 AM PDT by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: blam
Black Swans? That’s WAYSIST!...............
5 posted on
09/09/2014 6:27:37 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: blam
Plotting these swans on what looks like a normal curve is idiotic.
To: blam
ChiCom economy bump for later.....
7 posted on
09/09/2014 9:36:59 AM PDT by
indthkr
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson