Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reed13k

I didn’t say we should, I said we could. There is an entire doctrine about when Christians may engage in self-defense, and the means by which they can do so. They may be justified in actions up to and including the firebombing of civilians in Dresden and the atomic bombs in Japan. We will at some point be justified in nuking Mecca, but we are not there. We have to do all we can to avoid such actions. But the problem is, we are not taking any actions to defend Christendom. Hundreds of thousands of people are dying throughout the world, wherever Muslims have contact with civilization. There should be push back, there should be outreach to convince them their religion is a backward invention of a mad man, there should be containment, there should be protection of minorities, and whatever we need to do militarily for all those actions is authorized. What we don’t do is kill indiscriminately or without necessity to a higher, moral purpose.


11 posted on 09/08/2014 9:40:12 AM PDT by Defiant (4 main US grps: conservatives, useless idiots (aka RINOs), marxists and useful idiots (aka liberals))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

concur


13 posted on 09/08/2014 11:40:09 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson