Replies

To: lbryce

I say that one match is not proof he was Jack The Ripper.

If his DNA had been found on more than one of the victims, then it could be considered proof.

14 posted on 09/07/2014 9:54:32 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)

To: UCANSEE2

“I say that one match is not proof he was Jack The Ripper.

If his DNA had been found on more than one of the victims, then it could be considered proof.
“

What if there was only one victim? Do we say this is not proof until we have another victim?

36 posted on 09/08/2014 7:13:39 AM PDT by CodeToad (Romney is a raisin cookie looking for chocolate chip cookie votes.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794