To: Balding_Eagle
I don't agree. The 'second day' story has yet to occur, this time with a different woman, and this time they will also have a gun. Then blow their brains out. Whatever it takes to defend yourself and yours. If you get a CCW to rid the world of ner' do wells then have at it.
20 posted on
08/30/2014 12:40:44 PM PDT by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck; Balding_Eagle
I don't agree. The 'second day' story has yet to occur, this time with a different woman, and this time they will also have a gun. Making sure I get this straight, you're saying that because this woman didn't kill these two men, a) they will be back again; and b) they will be carrying.
And, given a and b, because this woman didn't kill these men, she shoulders the burden of your prediction because of this circumstance event.
just want to make sure I got the logic right. please correct otherwise.
24 posted on
08/30/2014 12:51:14 PM PDT by
onona
To: Starstruck
The chance to ‘blow their brains out’ has most likely passed.
The person who could have done so decided not too.
Just given the number of people who carry vs. those who don’t say that the next woman won’t have a gun.
25 posted on
08/30/2014 12:51:20 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Starstruck
Then blow their brains out. Whatever it takes to defend yourself and yours. If you get a CCW to rid the world of ner' do wells then have at it. A number here seem to be wannabe trophy hunters who ache for the chance to take a human life and get away with it - some of us believe that killing someone you don't need to kill is wrong. I'm with you on this one.
55 posted on
08/31/2014 2:41:39 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson