Posted on 08/30/2014 4:18:14 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
Sometimes voter-fraud deniers are forced to discuss the truth of voter fraud. This happened today at the Washington Post (Fairfax officials say some people may have crossed Va.-Md. line to vote twice in 2012). While the Post deserves credit from emerging from its cocoon of voter-fraud denial, it deserves scorn for bungling the emergence.
Reporter Susan Svrluga notes that tens of thousands of voters were registered to cast ballots in both Virginia and Maryland. Thats true, and it is a big problem nationwide. Hundreds of thousands of people are registered to vote in multiple states, and many of them have voted.
It wasnt Eric Holders Justice Department that discovered the problem. That wont happen because as I reported at PJ Media in 2010, Obama political appointees expressly shut down the efforts at DOJ to detect this sort of fraud and inadequate voter-roll maintenance.
Hans von Spakovsky notes who deserves the credit for detecting the problem:
It was the VVA along with another citizens group dedicated to election integrity, Election Integrity Maryland (EIM) that did the research on the voter files in Virginia and Maryland to find these illegal voters. And this may be only the tip of the iceberg: VVA and EIM turned the names of 43,893 individuals who appear to be registered in both states over to the State Boards of Elections in Virginia and Maryland. Fairfax County alone has more than 10,000 such duplicate registrations. These 17 voters are only a subset of at least 164 voters their research showed voted in both states in the 2012 election.
Naturally the Washington Post makes no inquiry as to why the Eric Holder Department of Justice has failed to do anything about the scourge of double registration. Its in DOJs job description. DOJ isnt doing the job. Instead, groups like the American Civil Rights Union, Judicial Watch and True the Vote have had to bring the cases Eric Holder has refused to bring to clean up voter rolls.
Those who create and manage the left-of-center election narrative ignore entirely this DOJ history, as does the Washington Post.
The other key fact ignored by the Washington Post is that in 2013 Virginia Democrats sued to stop election officials from trying to detect and cure this problem! I know because I, along with Judicial Watch, defended Virginias use of the cross-state check program to detect double registrations. The Post should not have omitted this fact when tracing out the partisan battle lines of the issue. The Democrats have gone all-in on the side of corrupted voter rolls.
Some newspapers fully informed their readers of this fact, unlike the Post. The Richmond Times Dispatch:
Purging voter rolls, however, can. Yet when the State Board of Elections took steps last year to clean up the voter rolls and asked localities to remove names of those no longer eligible from the rolls, the state Democratic Party sought an injunction to stop the process, and Chesterfields registrar, Lawrence Haake, declined to participate, citing inaccuracies. Haake might have been justified, and the board might have pushed too hard to execute what should be a painstaking process. But when those particular concerns are set aside, the general point stands: Localities should keep their voting rolls as up to date as reasonably possible.
Finally, the Post reporter downsizes the reason states are on the front lines of this issue:
Its a federalist, states-rights tradition that leaves a confusing mishmash of laws, rules and records, he said.
The reason states are in charge of their own elections is a federalist, states-rights tradition that leaves a confusing mishmash of laws? Really?
The reason states are in charge of their own elections is the United States Constitution (Article 1, Sec. 4). The Constitution gives states power over their own elections because it promotes liberty. The federal government does not have control over state election laws because centralization of power is unhealthy for liberty.
Its good to see the Washington Post finally report on voter fraud. Its not so good to see the predictable sanctuary given to the Democrat Partys attempted facilitation of the fraud, and the usual criticism of our Constitutional arrangement for running elections.
We have another 4 years of this clown becuase of voter fraud that even the GOP sat quietly in the corner on, shame on you feckless spineless idiots. You did a great diservice to your country and countrymen. You layed down when tagged with the racist label just like the rat party thought you would.
Voter fraud is a part of Democrat strategy.
IMHO
Blame also can go to the RNC for not squeaking when they lose an election to voter fraud. Just as any crime goes unreported if the victim doesn’t speak out. Philadelphia’s entire 19 districts voted for Obama TO THE VOTER! Let me rephrase that.. Not one vote was recorded as cast for Romney in any of the 19 districts of Philadelphia and the RNC couldn’t be bothered to find ONE voter to stand up and say his or her vote wasn’t counted. That is when it hit home that the RNC wanted to lose that election..
Amen.
Romney never looked more stupid than when he was conceding to Obama.....never once mentioning the massive voter fraud machine that stole the election from him.
I will NEVER forget the evil look on Obama's face when he took the mic knowing full well he had "won" a fraudulent reelection.
If those convicted of vote fraud lost not only their right to vote but all access to any gummint benefits it would stop in a heartbeat.
This could be the headline for most things “covered” by the Washington Compost - Inaccurately and Incompletely
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.