1 posted on
08/27/2014 6:24:08 AM PDT by
bamahead
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
2 posted on
08/27/2014 6:26:13 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: bamahead; Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; ...
JBT Ping list
Correction: And NOT Get Away With It!
3 posted on
08/27/2014 6:26:54 AM PDT by
null and void
(If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
To: bamahead
Fighting back ping to self.
6 posted on
08/27/2014 6:29:23 AM PDT by
SpeakerToAnimals
(I hope to earn a name in battle)
To: bamahead
I think the solution to this is for the cops to have to carry malfeasance (malpractice) insurance, and have it be at their own personal expense, by law.
Let the actuaries put the bad cops in another line of work.
7 posted on
08/27/2014 6:29:31 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: bamahead
Only when bad cops are held accountable instead of protected, then things will change.
This is a start.
8 posted on
08/27/2014 6:31:53 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
To: bamahead
To: bamahead
(the court agreed police had lawfully acquired the search warrant Why is there never repercussions for the judges that approve search warrant applications. those judges are supposed to be the control on overeager cops. Rubber stamping these applications defeats the purpose of having judicial review.
10 posted on
08/27/2014 6:35:54 AM PDT by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington)
To: bamahead
if the cops want to be soldiers, they should enlist
11 posted on
08/27/2014 6:36:04 AM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: bamahead
Just a generic observation and NOT to defend bad cops:
I don’t know where whole societal groups who gladly accepted a completely unvetted Presidential nominee are in a position to demand a more and greater vetting process for local law enforcement.
It is like having it both ways.
OK-so now, flame me.
13 posted on
08/27/2014 6:37:51 AM PDT by
SMARTY
("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
To: bamahead
What do you know? As soon as lefties get upset about “militarized policing” we get an appeals court ruling that starts rolling back cops’ immunity.
To: bamahead
"...discharging his Glock sidearm six times until the weapon finally jammed." But, IMPOSSIBLE!
Glocks are magical and never fail, OMG!
16 posted on
08/27/2014 6:39:54 AM PDT by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
Did You Know? The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarter's Expenses?
Now That You Do, Donate And Keep FR Running
18 posted on
08/27/2014 6:50:15 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: bamahead
On a Sunday afternoon in 2008, a tactical police team raided the Easton, Connecticut house of Ronald Terebesi searching for a small amount of personal drugs There should not be many justifications for this short of raid on private residences, and "small amounts of personal drugs" should not be one of them.
23 posted on
08/27/2014 7:18:31 AM PDT by
Will88
To: bamahead
After reading the article, I see that the subject of the raid was probably a dirt bag, but lived far enough out in the country to not be a danger to anyone who didn't trespass on his property or come into close contact with him. The balaclava and grenade raid was completely out of line for a minuscule amount of drugs. It's not like he was holding hostages or threatening a terrorist attack. The raid should have never happened. They could have just arrested him when he went to pick up his mail if they had a legitimate reason to.
I hate to make a joke about something that caused the death of someone, but this made me snicker a little:
"It has been suggested that what Sweeney actually felt was the explosion of the third flashbangand that in any event, throwing a grenade in front of your own officers is perhaps contrary to their interests."
What the heck? Did these cops learn to use flashbangs by playing CounterStrike online with 12 year-olds?
Darn 'nade spammers.
24 posted on
08/27/2014 7:22:46 AM PDT by
EricT.
(Everything not forbidden is compulsory.)
To: bamahead
“by discharging his Glock sidearm six times until the weapon finally jammed. “
Sooooo...we must know this is a bogus story because Glocks don’t jam?
30 posted on
08/27/2014 8:01:05 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Romney is a raisin cookie looking for chocolate chip cookie votes.)
To: bamahead
From the video it seems pretty obvious that the cops just blew their way into the house and killed the first person they saw. They should have gone through the house and killed everyone there. Then there would be no one to tell a tale that contradicts whatever the cops come up with.
They obviously forgot to use the magic exculpatory formula: "I felt threatened." Had the shooter said that all legal proceedings against the officers would have been simply thrown out of court and the shooter would have got himself an extra paid vacation and maybe an award for heroism.
31 posted on
08/27/2014 8:06:03 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
To: bamahead
The tactical teamcalled SWERT for Southwest Regional Emergency Response Team TWERK
Tactical
Weapons
Emergency
Response
Kops
34 posted on
08/27/2014 8:25:50 AM PDT by
MileHi
To: bamahead
35 posted on
08/27/2014 8:26:50 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: bamahead
There had been a number of incidents at Terebesi's house prior to the raid:
...
Neighbors complained of noise and traffic.
... While I really don't approve of any sort of SWAT raids on occupied residences, I just can't work up any sympathy for the sub-human druggie noise-makers.
If they could just napalm the noisy drug house from 30k feet, rather than just zapping one of the pests, and costing the taxpayers several million dollars, I'd be OK with that.
36 posted on
08/27/2014 8:30:02 AM PDT by
meadsjn
To: bamahead
One of the problems with these multi-jurisdictional task forces is that there is no "chain of command." Each member reports to a different political jurisdiction. Ultimately, no political entity is responsible for whatever the task force does. They can all point at someone else as being responsible for whatever went wrong.
38 posted on
08/27/2014 10:20:45 AM PDT by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Available from Amazon.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson