[GreenHornet]

The question now is: How much coverage will the MSM give to this? It was assumed by the media that he returned to Washington in order to address the pressing issues of Iraq and the situation in Ferguson, MO. He made a little speech about this while he was there, but now it turns out he was just traveling from one party to another on the taxpayer's dime. Once again, he played the media for fools. Are they going to call him on this, or, as usual, look the other way?

[UCANSEE2]

Are they going to call him on this,...

"Are you nuts?

[EDINVA]

He ALWAYS throws in some official “business” to his personal/partisan junkets so he’s not hit with the tab.

[rodguy911]

Why would anyone here care about what the drivebys/msm/old media cover and what they don't cover? We already know what their spin on everything and anything to do with their dear leader will be.

What's significant is that we in the New Media are finally getting our act together and reporting what is really going on.

I guess an even bigger question is how long will Major Garrett last at a network that couldn't stomach Sharyl Atkisson?

Other questions now being asked are how come those arrested in the suburbs of St. Louis are not from there and why do the same people--communist instigators-- seem to show up at crisis after crisis.

We "are" getting our act together in the New Media and that is the story. Not how the Old Media covers things. Who cares?