” Did you object to silence being used as a determing factor for guilt? Did you bother to state your thought that it shouldn’t be used? “
Again you misrepresent what I said. My statement was that he was convicted based on being drunk and running into someone at a high rate of speed and killing them. His silences was not the determining factor in his conviction. Even you agreed that he shouldn’t have gone free based on this ‘technicality.
In that post I stated exactly what went down.
I did not misrepresent you at all.
You did not address the question I asked on point.
You decided to avoid answering it on point.
Why? You could have simply answered the question.