Palin hasn’t forgotten.
You don’t endorse someone you’re enthusiastically behind four days before the Primary.
She stumped for this dweeb in 2010 and she’s still pulling the blade out of her back that his Huckabee staffers put there.
As I wrote over at C4P, Palin has Reagan’s charm and Nixon’s cunning.
What kinda cracks me up is that in 2012, anybody who didn't get behind Romney was a purist.
Palin, for all her flaws, is somebody who speaks MY mind politically, more than any other politician on the scene for as long as I can remember, with some exceptions. But Palin speaks for me every time I read her essays. She's got flaws and she's not perfect, but man -- she sure speaks for me. If she endorses a candidate, I'm listening.
There are many here who probably called me a purist in 2012 for rejecting Romney, shaking their fingers at me, saying, "You're making perfection the enemy of the good!"
Uh huh.