Hmmm. What happened to all the freepers telling us how Zig Zag is "more conservative than most Republicans up north" and so "honorable and patriotic"?
::crickets chirp::
To this day I can't understand the freepers who went into orgasms whenever Zig Zag spoke. If he had replaced a Barbara Boxer type RAT in the Senate, then yes, it would have been great to rejoice and rub it in the RATs faces since we upgraded to a much more "conservative" Senator and Zig Zag was probably "the best we can get" on the RAT side. But Zig Zag didn't replace a marxist. Instead, he replaced a guy with a 96% lifetime conservative record, and Zig Zag cast the tie-breaking vote to make Daschle the Senate President and let him control the agenda. His appointment to the US Senate moved that body to the LEFT.
He endorsed Max Cleland, and is now endorsing Michelle Nunn. Two marxist RATs for Senate. But he endorsed Bush in 2004 so somehow that makes it OK.
If that's their idea of a "true conservative", I'd hate to see what liberal looks like. Ironically the "RINO" they despise is much more reliably conservative than Zig Zag (and he won't be endorsing a RAT to replace him).
Good article calling out Nunn’s BS about maybe not supporting Reid and