ICR article image.
1 posted on
08/11/2014 8:07:05 AM PDT by
fishtank
To: fishtank
http://d1jqu7g1y74ds1.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/enceladus-geyser.jpg
2 posted on
08/11/2014 8:08:11 AM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
Just a reminder, it's "Enceladus", not "Ensalada".
Just a little Sapnish lesson for the day.
3 posted on
08/11/2014 8:11:10 AM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
If these geysers formed billions of years ago as secular origins models insist, then small Solar System bodies should be old, cold, and dead—that is, geologically, magnetically, and otherwise completely inactive.Red herring. The impact of Saturn's gravity drives this process, as it does on Jupiter's moon Io.
5 posted on
08/11/2014 8:11:50 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: fishtank
That “moon” could be a recent capture by Saturn, within the past few thousand or few hundred thousand years.
15 posted on
08/11/2014 9:32:27 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: fishtank
God created this for us to ooh and ahh over. Still, if this process has been going on for billions of years, where is all the water coming from?
16 posted on
08/11/2014 10:47:42 AM PDT by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: fishtank
If these geysers formed billions of years ago as secular origins models insist, then small Solar System bodies should be old, cold, and dead—that is, geologically, magnetically, and otherwise completely inactive. Wow! Total fail. Not surprising though.
20 posted on
08/12/2014 6:40:23 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson