Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just like Viet-Nam, Iraq was not our responsibility to save.

The majority in both countries did not want us to interfere in their business in the first place.

If you don’t believe me, get your child, cousin, father, mother, uncle, or any family member to go over there and die for absolutely NOTHING! You will find out they died for NOTHING!

Let these backward barbarians stew in their own rotting flesh.

I’ve had it with us being the Nanny Country that serves only big international business interests by the blood of our men and women.


4 posted on 08/09/2014 10:14:02 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DH

At the time, I strongly supported removing Saddam because he was a direct threat to our national security. And since, I’ve learned my lesson on “nation building” in a 7th century he— hole.

We’re back to square one if the ISIS threat to America is real. Do we destroy the threat or take our chances? I honestly don’t know.


6 posted on 08/09/2014 10:22:12 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson