Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From the Mouths of Thugs: 'Obama ... doesn't follow the Constitution (so) we don't have to.'
Reason ^ | August 7, 2014 | J.D. Tuccille

Posted on 08/07/2014 2:22:15 PM PDT by bamahead

Role models are so important, don't you think? They model behavior for us so that we know how to conduct ourselves on our twisty, winding path through life. So when Special Police Officer Richard Recine of the Borough of Helmetta, New Jersey, see President Obama decimate the friggin' constitution, he knows it's time to do some decimating of his own.

Writes Sergio Bichao of the Home News Tribune:

A New Jersey police officer was caught on camera telling a resident that police don't have to follow the Constitution because President Obama doesn't, either.

Special Police Officer Richard Recine, of the Borough of Helmetta Police Department, is now the subject of an internal affairs investigation after the video was posted online and was seen by Police Director Robert Manney, who called the comments an "embarrassment."

In the video, taken Monday at the borough municipal building, resident Steve Wronko gets into a verbal confrontation with Recine, who was called to the building because Wronko was seen taking pictures inside.

After Wronko insists he has a constitutional right to record in a public place, Recine responds.

"Obama has decimated the friggin' constitution, so I don't give a damn," said Recine, who is a retired Franklin, N.J., police officer. "Because if he doesn't follow the Constitution we don't have to."

Wronko was in the municipal building as part of his ongoing efforts to raise concerns about the local animal shelter. What he got instead was a fascinating lesson in constitutional law from Recine.

Robert A Manney, Helmetta's police director, is understandly upset about the whole thing. Ignoring constitutional niceties is one thing; openly expressing institutional contempt for the Constitution probably pulls the veil back a bit too far.

Recine, who invokes "all the terrorism" as grounds for confronting Wronko, works part-time while collecting a $79,000 annual pension for an earlier police gig. Double-dipping is a time-honored tradition in the state.

The videorecording was made by a 13-year-old, by the way, cuz the kids need role models, too. The fun starts at about the 2:17 mark.

Update: Sergio Bichao, who reported the original story, tweets that Richard Recine is now a former special officer, having resigned his position. Full story here.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; jbt; policestate
Mod - Full Title:

From the Mouths of Thugs: 'Obama has decimated the friggin' constitution...if he doesn't follow the Constitution we don't have to.'

Video at link.
1 posted on 08/07/2014 2:22:15 PM PDT by bamahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
The (former) JBT in question.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

2 posted on 08/07/2014 2:24:26 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

“mouth of thugs”?


3 posted on 08/07/2014 2:31:33 PM PDT by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

In before the badge worshippers.


4 posted on 08/07/2014 2:31:40 PM PDT by Darksheare (I don't have a copy. one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
When the President is lawless why should anyone be law abiding?

...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ...

When elected officials and bureaucracies act outside the law they are simply lawbreakers. When the majority of the people vote in favor of total lawlessness in the highest office they are withdrawing their consent to be governed by a constitutional government. By what legitimate basis does the United States of America, as a Constitutional republic, still exist?

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

'The People' no longer support that. They voted in support of lawlessness from the highest office on down. They voted against the rule of law. By referendum we now have a banana republic.

5 posted on 08/07/2014 2:32:29 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
Obama wants anarchy. He has a lot of hollow points to use.
6 posted on 08/07/2014 2:36:39 PM PDT by deadrock (I am someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Gollygosh!
Ya think Ritchie was the onlyist JBT to think this way?
Ya think?

(Yep, he pulled that veil back more than a tad too far.)


7 posted on 08/07/2014 2:41:47 PM PDT by Flintlock (Deport them ALLLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock
"Ya think Ritchie was the onlyist JBT to think this way?"

Other officers who think like this will be wise to keep it to themselves unless they are willing to risk losing their jobs. This is a good example of where freedom speech doesn't guarantee immunity from its consequences.

8 posted on 08/07/2014 3:14:33 PM PDT by Respond Code Three (Support Free Republic lest we eventually get a Republic which is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

“Free speech!” says his union spokesman.


9 posted on 08/07/2014 3:16:22 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

The police guy was right and wrong.


10 posted on 08/07/2014 3:18:43 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
"Special Police Officer Richard Recine, of the Borough of Helmetta Police Department, is now the subject of an internal affairs investigation after the video was posted online and was seen by Police Director Robert Manney, who called the comments an "embarrassment."

Only because they were made public.

11 posted on 08/07/2014 3:37:38 PM PDT by ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of liberty only to see marxism elected at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

I doubt cops are trained on the constitution. I’m starting to wonder if maybe they ARE trained not to follow it.


12 posted on 08/07/2014 3:45:11 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
"I’m starting to wonder if maybe they ARE trained not to follow it."

Departments which might sanction this type of attitude risk having personnel successfully sued and convicted of civil rights violations. Such lawsuits or prosecutions can go all the way to the Department Head.

"I doubt cops are trained on the constitution."

When I was in search warrant training, a judge was one of the lecturers. He explained why it was so effective to obtain a search warrant to get the evidence. It eliminated a lot of "motions to suppress evidence." Lawyers who wanted to suppress the evidence had to challenge the judge, and it was nearly impossible to get the evidence thrown out.

13 posted on 08/07/2014 4:11:05 PM PDT by Respond Code Three (Support Free Republic lest we eventually get a Republic which is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

If there is no law, there is no law.

If the president can disregard the law protecting the people, the can not the disregard the law protecting the President


14 posted on 08/07/2014 4:13:30 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Police director if helmetta can be emailed @
rmanney@helmettaboro.com.


15 posted on 08/07/2014 5:23:55 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
From the Mouths of Thugs: 'Obama ... doesn't follow the Constitution (so) we don't have to.'

Well, that's actually sort of true. You can't have random pockets of society following the document and everyone else not. Either the paper is valid or it's not.

16 posted on 08/07/2014 7:36:32 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; ...
JBT Ping list


17 posted on 08/08/2014 5:31:50 AM PDT by null and void (If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Who said Obama isn’t an inspirational leader?


18 posted on 08/08/2014 5:37:53 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

All kinds of executive orders are possible.


19 posted on 08/08/2014 5:47:04 AM PDT by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Went to HS with Rich. Actually he’s a Constitutionist. Said a stupid sarcastic thing thatb cost him his job. What he said was correct. If our President no longer upholds the Constitution (as well as our Congress and Supreme Court) then why are the rest of us peons now required to follow it....


20 posted on 08/08/2014 6:00:39 AM PDT by freebilly (How about this-- we stop trying to elect the unelectable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson