To: nickcarraway
Well, it’s immediate, painless, foolproof, not affected by the subject’s body weight, and doesn’t require a physician’s assistance. Sounds like a winner to me.
To: DoodleDawg
Hey, this is the 21st century, we can do better than that
I think a high powered laser would be best, fast, and it
cauterizes the wound so very little bleeding, short
clean up and quick turn around.
31 posted on
08/04/2014 1:28:28 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: DoodleDawg
Well, its immediate, painless, foolproof, not affected by the subjects body weight, and doesnt require a physicians assistance. Sounds like a winner to me. Not only that, it would return the death penalty's lost effectiveness as a deterrent by returning to a method that is fearsome rather than peaceful.
60 posted on
08/04/2014 5:33:42 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson