Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
She gave the Israeli rep hard questions and he fielded them perfectly.

This gives Israel a chance to get their story out in a fair fashion.

Tough questions that receive well founded, true and accurate answers are a good thing for Israel. The facts on the ground support Israel and solid, truthful answers to hard ball questions add to the credibility and strength of the Israeli position.

Would one rather have a CNN or MSNBC situation where some Hamas supporting asks questions like , “ when will Israel stop commiting war crimes “

7 posted on 08/01/2014 11:05:48 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rdcbn; JimRed; Gaffer

Mostly disagree with rdcbn and JimRed. Every question Megyn asked was one that might be asked more loudly and accusingly at MSNBC; all the horrible images and all the accusations that can be directed at Israel. Nothing wrong with those questions, but that is all there was for 8 minutes.

No questions about Israel’s goals in the operation, progress and what circumstances would end their operation in Gaza. No time for the ambassador to explain Israel’s position in positive terms, just responses to the most negative accusations that can be made against Israel.

One-sided questions; not Fair and Balanced.


16 posted on 08/01/2014 12:26:48 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson