Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian asks Broward judge to toss Florida’s gay-marriage ban, then dissolve her Vermont civil union
Miami Herald ^ | 7/30/14 | Steve Rothaus

Posted on 08/01/2014 2:17:21 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

A Broward judge must decide whether to recognize — and then dissolve — a lesbian’s Vermont civil union.

(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; homosexuality; marriage; states
Dangerous times. If this nasty business succeeds in court, it means "civil unions" in Vermont equals "marriage" in Florida.

It also means the tenth amendment is meaningless....and religious freedom is threatened.

This young lady needs to get her union dissolved in Vermont.

1 posted on 08/01/2014 2:17:22 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
lazy and manipulative provocateur bitch.

spend the money, go back to vermont and play your game in the cess pool you started in.

2 posted on 08/01/2014 2:27:27 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

She can’t even find her ex-husband, er, -wife. Why not file for abandonment... in Vermont.

Oh, that’s right.

This isn’t about what normal people do. It’s about pro-gay jurisdictional ping-pong.

If her first marriage doesn’t exist in another state, there’s no need to get a divorce in the new state. Simply civil-unionise with new squeeze in the new state... oh dang, that’s a moot point too, ain’t it?

Sometimes I’m of a mind to grant the gays’ wishes for the dubious blessing of marrying and divorcing each other, just to prove to them that they still won’t get what they really want. You can ‘institutionalise’ queer love all you want, but it’s going to repulse normal society no matter what.


3 posted on 08/01/2014 2:36:04 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

With perverts being the new must have one toy of the media our President and the Democrat Political Party, this is a done deal!


4 posted on 08/01/2014 3:22:39 AM PDT by 48th SPS (Not Republican. Not a Democrat. I am an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
It also means the tenth amendment is meaningless....and religious freedom is threatened. This young lady needs to get her union dissolved in Vermont.

Quite possibly the whole point - set a "precedent" and let those who value precedence over correctness push the ball over the crest of the hill.

5 posted on 08/01/2014 3:55:59 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson