I don’t understand how a federal court can rule against this, when a Supreme Court case has already upheld voter I.D. laws. What is this other than a rogue court?
judges have a severe tendency to egomania.
For example, when a ussc judge is asked about “repecting stare decisis” (prior cases); nominees give a meaningless yes. meaningless because the USSC is the one court that can TOTALY IGNORE prior cases.
Judges will make a rogue ruling because the KNOW not everyone can afford the whithering expense of an appeal. Appeals drag on and consume and destroy lives, bankrupt the innocent, and foster slap suits.
I dont understand how a federal court can rule against this, when a Supreme Court case has already upheld voter I.D. laws. What is this other than a rogue court?
++++
Good question. We are rapidly approaching the complete politicization of the Judiciary. Three Branches Good, Two Branches Better - to coin, or steal, a phrase.
Wait until we get to One Branch Nirvana. That will be something to see - or to run from.
Adelman is a hack Dem pol who was appointed to the court in a move to get him out of the legislature so that the legislature could approve taxing communities to build the retractible domed Milwaukee Brewer's stadium. He has been a pain in the (you know what) ever since with his controversial rulings. LouD, do you have anything to add to that.
The Federal court in this case upheld the law they didn’t rule against it.