Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lake Living

I wonder if the Founding Fathers ever realized that having the chief executive pick such judges really defeats separation of powers, since the judicial branch then becomes an extension of the executive branch?


29 posted on 07/29/2014 9:49:32 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

“I wonder if the Founding Fathers ever realized that having the chief executive pick such judges really defeats separation of powers, since the judicial branch then becomes an extension of the executive branch?”

The separation of powers is with the Senate. The problem is the Senate has pretty much become a rubber stamp for any judicial nominees the POTUS throws it’s way. Or at least that’s the case when it comes to Democratic Presidents. The Senate does have the power to reject any nominee at any time.


53 posted on 07/29/2014 10:27:16 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson