Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative
I am a strong advocate of both the RKBA and property rights. A property owner/employer does have a right to allow or disallow employees and customers to be armed on their property.

Having said that, all rights are coupled with responsibilities, and if a property owner is going to disallow his employees, customers and guests the means of protecting themselves, they incur an obligation to protect each and every one of them. I think an easy solution is to allow the employer to make the rules permitting or not permitting lawful firearm ownership on their property, but should they choose to bar firearms, knives, pepper spray, etc. they assume both corporate and personal liability for persons injured or killed as a result of their decision to disarm.

6 posted on 07/26/2014 6:52:00 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack
A property owner/employer does have a right to allow or disallow employees and customers to be armed on their property.

I can point out where I have the right to keep and bear arms recognized by the Constitution. Where in the constitution is the right for property owners and employers to remove other constitutionally guaranteed rights? What other rights can they forbid?

16 posted on 07/26/2014 7:28:36 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Joe 6-pack
You are right, where was security to ensure their safety? The Doctor knew to
bring a gun probably because he knew that Security there was being
conducted by the resident psychologist most likely. The Doc took action
and saved lives. Good. The wounded and Victims of this should sue the hospital.
24 posted on 07/26/2014 7:57:52 AM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Joe 6-pack

I can choose to patronize a “gun free” restaurant, the owner cannot make it safe. I know it’s unsafe when I enter, if there’s a problem I don’t believe I have any recourse with the restaurant. I choose not to patronize “gun free” businesses. In the case of hospitals, medical offices, etc., in most of the country if not all these places are legally “gun free zones”. You cannot protect yourself and they cannot protect you and if something happens you have no recourse. You cannot simply go down the street to the next medical center where you will find a firearms welcome sign. I’m for abolishing gun free zones or as they have here “Weapons free Zones”, I guess they’re afraid I’d bring my hammer but if I did we’d all be more safe.


29 posted on 07/26/2014 8:37:24 AM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson