Judge strikes down gay marriage ban, stays ruling

yahoo/ap ^ | 7/23/14

[SoFloFreeper]

A federal judge in Denver declared Colorado's gay marriage ban unconstitutional Wednesday, but he temporarily put the ruling on hold to give the state until next month to seek an appeal....

Colorado Republican Attorney General John Suthers and Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper had requested a stay so the issue could eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court — though both agreed the state ban should be declared unconstitutional.

[SoFloFreeper]

Colorado Republican Attorney General John Suthers...agreed the state ban should be declared unconstitutional.

Republicans like this one make me understand why so many conservatives refuse to give money to the party.

These men and women are moral wimps.

Do they truly not give a DAMN about future generations and the end result of the forced celebration of sodomy??

Wake up, America.

[madprof98]

America is not going to “wake up” on this one. Republicans have now joined their Democrat friends in a gleeful celebration of the demise of the institution formerly known as the The Family. And why not? With the family out of the picture, everyone can rely on the government for everything.

[StonyBurk]

The lawless Judge errs. “Marriage” remains as it is written of in Scripture—in “the Law dictated by God,Himself” .IT is as described in the Gospel according to Matthew chapter 19: and in the Gospel according to Mark chapter 10: The Fraud of same sex Marriage remains a LIE. IF this unjust Judge represents the US Constitution— he/she/it ought understand that the Federal Government has NO power over the States to define what “marriage” is. IF the Ignorant Judge cites a mere fragment taken out of context void of any reflection of its motivation or intent (speaking of the fourteenth Amendment) then the Judge’s opinion is in error. The fourteenth Amendment was directly motivated by the extreme animus and desire to punish the South for the War between the States.It was motivated by the desire to force the States to recognize the freed African slaves as citizen. It’s intent was to force the States to recognize the black skinned people as citizens. It is Unreasonable for ANY to suppose that Anyone can impose upon America the confusion that results in the law claiming that sexual orientation equates to race— or skin color. The former is a choice of behavior that invites reward for the error that is due— the other is purely genetic— a gift of God that cannot change.
There is credible evidence that suggests the fourteenth Amendment unlike any other was NEVER Constitutional but was adopted as result of Reconstruction. But even if it were Constitutional—and it is convenient to go along just to get along— IT was NEVER intended to amend the Bill of Rights NOR to apply the Federal Bill of Rights to the States.So the activist Judge is wrong on several Counts. and Ought be IMPEACHED if he/she/ or it refuses to step down. There is no justice when a Judge usurps his/her/ its Constitutional powers and harms the Constitution.