Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

While Hillary Clinton offers a resume, Elizabeth Warren offers a plan
Washington Examiner ^ | 07/22/2014 | Byron York

Posted on 07/22/2014 1:37:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

It seems almost too obvious to mention, but presidential candidates need a clear idea of why they want to be president. In the past few days, Democrats have heard that their still-undeclared front runner, Hillary Clinton, needs time to think about the question.

Meanwhile, another undeclared hopeful, Elizabeth Warren, is thrilling liberal audiences with a forceful, point-by-point declaration of the principles that would guide her as president. The contrast is striking.

Clinton is offering Democrats her resume. Warren is offering them a plan.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2016; byronyork; clinton; elizabethwarren; fauxohontas; hillary; hillary2016; lieawatha; massachusetts; warren2016; washingtonexaminer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
RE: While Hillary Clinton offers a resume, Elizabeth Warren offers a plan

Conservatives might not like Warren's plan but it sure excites the left wing base.

1 posted on 07/22/2014 1:37:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here’s what you get with a President Fauxcahontas (please offer your translation as to what it means in terms of policy):

* “We believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher enforcement, and we’re willing to fight for it”

* “We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth.”

* “We believe that the Internet shouldn’t be rigged to benefit big corporations, and that means real net neutrality.”

* “We believe that no one should work full-time and still live in poverty, and that means raising the minimum wage.”

* to fight for a “livable wage,”

* to fight for relief from student debt,

* to fight to protect Social Security and Medicare,

* to fight for “equal pay for equal work,”

* to fight for gay rights,

* to fight for immigration reform

* to fight to overturn the Hobby Lobby decision and ensure that women “have a right to their bodies.


2 posted on 07/22/2014 1:40:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Clinton, Warren two socialist that goose step to the same tunes. We need a real conservative and not a RINO to run against either one and the Conservative will win.


3 posted on 07/22/2014 1:41:35 PM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve seen this plan before.

It was called “The Communist Manifesto”.

And no, it’s not a good idea.


4 posted on 07/22/2014 1:42:02 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So her plan can be summed up as “more socialism”.


5 posted on 07/22/2014 1:42:37 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
* to fight for a “livable wage,”

* to fight for immigration reform

I love how liberals fail to realize how intrinsically related these two are. I guess they feel they can simply legislate away the detrimental effects on blue-collar wages that illegal immigration has caused over the decades.

6 posted on 07/22/2014 1:43:25 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s not a plan, that is a liberal wish list.


7 posted on 07/22/2014 1:44:07 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

It’s not intended to pass the test of logical scrutiny. The target audience is incapable of that.


8 posted on 07/22/2014 1:45:37 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Like it or not Elizabeth Warren is learning to master the BRANDING and MESSAGING technique.

Her plan is to consolidate the left-wing base on the Democratic party.

Once she has the left-wing in her palms, she’ll slowly move to the right to attract the low principled, low information voters.

She’s learning from Obama, but this time, she’ll use GENDER, not race (I don’t think branding herself as an American Indian will work so she’ll dispense with that ).

That’s the way I see it.


9 posted on 07/22/2014 1:45:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If only either could offer a clue.


10 posted on 07/22/2014 1:50:19 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
* “We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth.”

Translation: Christians have no place in society and will be further marginalized. We will worship the earth and all US citizens will be forced to bow down and pay tithes to climate change.

11 posted on 07/22/2014 1:52:57 PM PDT by Obadiah (None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In other words, “Peace! Land! Bread!”


12 posted on 07/22/2014 1:53:48 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarc tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Conservatives might not like Warren's plan but it sure excites the left wing base.

It is tailor made for today's base Democrat voter.

The promise of televised public floggings of Wall Street bankers will bring many more votes to her as well.


13 posted on 07/22/2014 1:54:29 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
to fight to overturn the Hobby Lobby decision and ensure that women “have a right to their bodies.

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

DEMOCRATS WANT TO FORCE EMPLOYERS TO BUY THEIR EMPLOYEES' BIRTH CONTROL TO KEEP EMPLOYERS OUT OF THEIR EMPLOYEES' HEATH CARE DECISIONS.

14 posted on 07/22/2014 1:55:02 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Leftists always have a "plan". Most of their "plans" are fantasy and BS. When then fail, there is a new plan. There is never accountability for the consequences of the failed plans of the past. The fake indian already has failures she wants overlooked. Hillary has a long list of failures and knows better than to wave more "plans" right now. Both are liberal losers.
15 posted on 07/22/2014 1:57:53 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
She'll be a viable candidate because she has a FAWNING MEDIA THAT LOVES HER.

Harvard hired her and called her an Indian

She made her money flipping houses in the 90s

She made a name for herself in politics by going after "predatory lenders" - i.e. those banks that gave loans to people who bought Warren's houses.

She's attacking banks and Wall Street bankers - guess who paid for her campaign?

She owns 8 million dollars in stock, but wants to ban stock ownership.

How many of these things have you heard the media discuss in detail?
16 posted on 07/22/2014 1:57:55 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

RE: She made her money flipping houses in the 90s

Hey, she and my rich uncle (or were ) in the same business !!


17 posted on 07/22/2014 1:59:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A teepee for every family


18 posted on 07/22/2014 1:59:48 PM PDT by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Here’s what you get with a President Fauxcahontas (please offer your translation as to what it means in terms of policy):

* “We believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher enforcement, and we’re willing to fight for it”

We're nationalizing your 401k & 403b. Forget about capitalizing industry; The People will own everything.

* “We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth.”

Global warming is REAL, I tell you! REAL! Say goodbye to coal. And petroleum. And natural gas. And nuclear. You get to be colder in the winter and warmer in the summer ... and live in government issued apartments near your assigned workplace. It's a small sacrifice for you little people to make.

* “We believe that the Internet shouldn’t be rigged to benefit big corporations, and that means real net neutrality.”

We, the Government, on behalf of The People, will decide what content you get to see and when you get to see it. For your own protection.

* “We believe that no one should work full-time and still live in poverty, and that means raising the minimum wage.”

Everyone gets to live in equal poverty. Except for the Guardians of the People.

* to fight for a “livable wage,”

We decide what you get to live on. For your own good.

* to fight for relief from student debt,

You won't rack up student debt; we'll decide what education you need, for the common good.

* to fight to protect Social Security and Medicare,

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. Guess who decides what you need?

* to fight for “equal pay for equal work,”

Everybody's a slave, and gets paid crap.

* to fight for gay rights,

Sodomy will be mandatory.

* to fight for immigration reform

We will take from the privileged oppressors their ill-gotten gains, and give to the poor downtrodden campesinos

* to fight to overturn the Hobby Lobby decision and ensure that women “have a right to their bodies.

KILL!!! KILL!!! KILL!!! WE WANT MORE DEAD BABIES!!!!!!

19 posted on 07/22/2014 2:00:34 PM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

RE: She made a name for herself in politics by going after “predatory lenders” - i.e. those banks that gave loans to people who bought Warren’s houses.

This is self-contradictory, if her purpose is to sell the houses, why would she go after those banks lending money to those who are going to buy them?


20 posted on 07/22/2014 2:00:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson