Posted on 07/21/2014 6:49:40 AM PDT by blam
Should be election 2014.
Don’t believe I’ll be around in 3014 for those.
I will be here, thanks to cybernetics and Chinese prisoner organs
Those that own L4B (little bath-house barry bastard boy) want things to degenerate to the point of the bullet box, so this may be our last chance in America to apply the ballot box solution before the collapse and end to the Republic. And I am DEAD SERIOUS on that count. This may be the last chance for a vast majority to exercise sovereign power over the political scumbuckets. Get everyone you know can vote out to vote and throw the damned bums out before they end the chance to do so.
Thanks
Yeah. But an hour later you’ll need another Chinese organ.
LOL
Make that 1002 years!
Another 102 1/2 ? Check yer math
No math points for you...
Oh, wait...
Not the headline — for some reason it isn’t part of preview.
The message should be taken seriously typo or not!
In the year 3014, elections will be interstellar......................
So far this thread is full of mistakes. You might want to have it deleted and start over! lol
Well....I asked the moderator to correct the title before there were any posts you can see what good that did.
If they'll delete it, I'll re-post it.
Thirty six Senate seats. But who's counting.
Thanks for posting this, obviously we have a lot of ADD readers who can’t concentrate.
This forwarded email is dated, probably from being forwarded so often so I thought I would do some searching.
Know your enemy...those who are fighting FOR signing w/ICC...
http://www.amicc.org/
and
http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=country&iduct=185
Info from the 2nd link regarding the Rome Statute and the status of the U.S....
“On 31 December 2000, David Scheffer, Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues under the Clinton Administration, signed the Rome Statute. Signature of a treaty does not create legally binding obligations for the Signatory State, however according to Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), a signatory who intends to ratify is bound to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty. On 6 May 2002, shortly before the Rome Statute entered into force on 1 July 2002, the administration of US President George W. Bush sent a note to the United Nations Secretary-General “nullifying” the Clinton signature. Since 2009, the US has sent observer delegations to the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties and, more recently, to the Review Conference. The US position has gradually evolved into one of principled engagement with the ICC and strengthened support for the Court’s current investigations and prosecutions. The Obama Administration has stated that it has no intention of ratifying the Rome Statute in the near future.”
However, this is by no means a reason NOT to VOTE. Are the COIN Rules of Engagement Constitutional? Signing with ICC is not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.