Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rupert Murdoch Is Rebuffed in Offer for Time Warner
New York Times ^ | 07/16/2014 | By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and MICHAEL J. DE LA MERCED

Posted on 07/16/2014 7:30:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The media giant 21st Century Fox, the empire run by Rupert Murdoch, made an $80 billion takeover bid in recent weeks for Time Warner Inc. but was rebuffed.

The bold approach could put Time Warner in play and might again ignite a reshaping of the media industry, prompting a new spate of mega-mergers among the nation’s largest entertainment companies.

Mr. Murdoch has built a global media juggernaut over nearly five decades spanning studios, television channels and newspapers, in part, by pursuing bold deals that were often rebuffed at first by the targets of his overtures, only to later acquiesce.

Time Warner on Wednesday confirmed that it had rejected a cash and stock offer from 21st Century Fox, saying that it was not in the company’s best interests. The Time Warner statement pointed to its own strategic plan, what it said was “uncertainty” over the value of 21st Century Fox stock and regulatory risks as among the reasons for its rebuff.

The company said that 21st Century Fox had offered 1.531 of its Class A non-voting common shares and $32.42 in cash for every Time Warner share — or a total of nearly $86.30, a premium of roughly 22 percent to Time Warner’s closing price on Tuesday.

Earlier on Wednesday, 21st Century Fox also confirmed that it had made a formal offer to Time Warner last month. ”The Time Warner board of directors declined to pursue our proposal,” the statement said. “We are not currently in any discussions with Time Warner.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dealbook.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rupertmurdoch; timewarner

1 posted on 07/16/2014 7:30:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Our media is overwhelmingly in the control of a gigantic leftist cabal.

I know, that sounds conspiratorial, but it is what I believe.

The fact that Fox is being held off this takeover, simply reinforces my view.


2 posted on 07/16/2014 7:33:29 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
TWC's customer base should be elated, That RM wanted to
buy TWC, whom has a reputation for cr@ppy service.

3 posted on 07/16/2014 7:38:54 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Jihadist/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Time Warner Cable is not part of Time Warner.


4 posted on 07/16/2014 7:41:54 AM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought Time Warner was merging with Comcast?


5 posted on 07/16/2014 7:44:33 AM PDT by Bruce Kurtz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange; All
Time Warner Cable is not part of Time Warner.
then Comcast; did Buy TWC, figures Comcast...
isn't known for good service, only bad service.

6 posted on 07/16/2014 7:48:55 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Jihadist/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Thanks for the clarification. Time Warner spun off Time Warner Cable


7 posted on 07/16/2014 7:49:24 AM PDT by Bruce Kurtz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

All true enough, but this article is about a (new) offer for Time Warner, not the cable company.

Murdoch is being rebuffed, in his takeover bid for Time Warner.

Why is that?


8 posted on 07/16/2014 7:51:01 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Why is that?
donno know; still foggy as to reasons...

9 posted on 07/16/2014 8:01:33 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Jihadist/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds like the same jabberwocky that was going on when Comcast was trying to take over NBC Universal.


10 posted on 07/16/2014 8:21:31 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Doubtless because the Time Warner board thinks it’s worth more than Fox is offering. So the game continues...


11 posted on 07/16/2014 8:22:25 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Kurtz

Per the report on FoxNews this morning, it is the content holdings of Time Warner that is its value. That content value should increase in the Internet age, as in streaming.


12 posted on 07/16/2014 8:24:42 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson