[Dilbert San Diego]

An irony here, is that Chuck Schumer was a sponsor of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. That law was the basis for the Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case.

I think Chuck should explain to us why he supported that law, why he sponsored that law in the first place. If he feels so strongly about all of this, why did he favor a law which sought to explicitly define that we have religious freedoms in our lives?????

[Jeff Chandler]

An irony here, is that Chuck Schumer was a sponsor of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

Yeah, but that law was passed to protect the rights and rites of cool people—(Injuns), not low-life Christians.

[Salvation]

Talking out of both sides of his mouth? Horrors!