To: george76
They declared his property a wetland, so removing rainwater is “endangering” it. It doesn’t matter that the fire department relies on his supply of water as an emergency backup.
3 posted on
07/09/2014 1:59:29 PM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Telepathic Intruder
That is not the case.
This is not about environmentalism, but about water rights - specifically about Harrington diverting water from the Big Butte River.
6 posted on
07/09/2014 2:03:40 PM PDT by
wideawake
To: Telepathic Intruder
"They declared his property a wetland, so removing rainwater is endangering it."
But here's what the article says.
"Harrington was found guilty two weeks ago of breaking a 1925 law for having, what state water managers called three illegal reservoirs on his property...The Oregon Water Resources Department, claims that Harrington has been violating the states water use law by diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River."
The State government did it--the same people who are wanting to take our rights out of the Constitution and rule over us even more like commies/monarchs (same thing).
64 posted on
07/09/2014 4:18:23 PM PDT by
familyop
("Nice girl, but about as sharp as a sack of wet mice." --Foghorn Leghorn)
To: Telepathic Intruder
67 posted on
07/09/2014 4:45:24 PM PDT by
familyop
("Nice girl, but about as sharp as a sack of wet mice." --Foghorn Leghorn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson