Posted on 07/08/2014 10:46:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
I’d say that’s the post of the day!
Hey, hey, hey!
(Next verse) :-)
Yes and no.
There is a cost associated with evaluating individuals. There is a much lesser cost associated with determining whether an individual is part of "Group A", a group with certain median levels for certain characteristics.
As an example, on the street at night, I do not have the ability to run criminal background checks on the people who pass me. Statistically, elderly oriental women have a very low probability of being armed robbers. I therefore can safely decide to not be on high alert when I meet one late at night.
Totally agree. The “Bell Curve” explains everything that you see in real life. Everything from the hellholes that are Africa and Detroit to the excellence of the Ben Carsons and Thomas Sowells.
Tragically it also leads to some inescapable logical conclusions. After thinking about it I’ve deduced that two groups of people that are easily identifiable AND that have a significant difference in average IQ will never be able to coexist peacefully. I won’t go into the rationale here, but it’s the logical result of that reality and human nature.
That conclusion is easily supported by the evidence here in the US and anywhere else where such condition exists, regardless of which group is in the majority.
Somewhere a leftist cries.
It takes leftists and RINOs decades to discover things that conservatives already had known.
Twisting science to meet a political agenda - how rude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.