Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Second Amendment First
If someone *wants* to pay extra money for a battery powered feature that may malfunction in a critical moment, then good for them.
Any assailant I can possibly expect won't have it on his gun so why should I?

4 posted on 07/08/2014 7:26:22 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BitWielder1

If it’s a good idea make the feds and every police department inn the country use it first. Otherwise its the most egregious Orwellian tyranny yet.


5 posted on 07/08/2014 7:42:25 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BitWielder1

or an easily jammed signal that reders the user unarmed.


8 posted on 07/08/2014 7:55:02 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BitWielder1

I’m not sure how effective using biometrics to fire a weapon would be, but I’m not entirely against such measures for gun storage. I’m thinking, if you have a household with children and their friends in it, it might be advantageous to have a safe that only mommy or daddy’s thumb/eye could open.


14 posted on 07/08/2014 8:20:26 AM PDT by H8Libs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson