To: Second Amendment First
If someone *wants* to pay extra money for a battery powered feature that may malfunction in a critical moment, then good for them.
Any assailant I can possibly expect won't have it on his gun so why should I?
4 posted on
07/08/2014 7:26:22 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: BitWielder1
If it’s a good idea make the feds and every police department inn the country use it first. Otherwise its the most egregious Orwellian tyranny yet.
5 posted on
07/08/2014 7:42:25 AM PDT by
thorvaldr
To: BitWielder1
or an easily jammed signal that reders the user unarmed.
8 posted on
07/08/2014 7:55:02 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: BitWielder1
I’m not sure how effective using biometrics to fire a weapon would be, but I’m not entirely against such measures for gun storage. I’m thinking, if you have a household with children and their friends in it, it might be advantageous to have a safe that only mommy or daddy’s thumb/eye could open.
14 posted on
07/08/2014 8:20:26 AM PDT by
H8Libs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson