Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Fuel Efficient Cars Causing Highway Trust Fund to Go Broke
www.weeklystandard.com ^ | 9:24 AM, Jul 7, 2014 | By GEOFFREY NORMAN

Posted on 07/07/2014 7:38:43 AM PDT by Red Badger

Washington needs more money and if it doesn’t get it, your morning commute will become:

a) more expensive

b) more unpleasant

c) both

The problem, you see, is that the Highway Trust Fund is "going broke,” by the Beltway’s curious definition of the phrase. It is sort of the way that after a round of painful “cuts,” spending somehow still goes up.

The Highway Trust Fund takes in more than 18 cents on every gallon of gasoline sold in this country, so there is plenty of revenue. Just not enough to meet Washington’s needs and desires. People are driving more fuel efficient cars and with gas already around $4 a gallon, not taking the trips they might otherwise take. So instead of having the $50 billion that Congress budgeted, the trust fund is looking at $34 billion.

So cuts are coming, possibly as soon as August, and, as Keith Laing of The Hill reports:

Those cuts could leave drivers facing congested or damaged roads, sparking anger ahead of November's midterms.

Sort of like closing down the monuments during one of those government shutdowns. The idea being to inflict immediate pain.

The president has gotten involved, talking about the jobs that are at stake and saying:

“We’re not going to be able to fund the Highway Trust Fund and to ramp up our investment in infrastructure without acts of Congress.”

Gasoline is not a discretionary item in the budget of most Americans. Making it more expensive means there will be less to spend elsewhere. The people calling for urgent measures to keep the trust fund from going broke say they are concerned about jobs.” Theirs.

One wonders just how much pork a penny a gallon in new taxes would buy.

No talk, of course, of privatizing. Using the tolls mechanism.

Just more taxes. For jobs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: automobile; cars; energy; fuel; gasoline; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 07/07/2014 7:38:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And bike paths, hiking trails, green belts, public transportation, and union pension funding has nothing to do with it. /s


2 posted on 07/07/2014 7:41:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Aren't those fuel efficient cars supposed to be lighter, therefore wear much less on the roads?

3 posted on 07/07/2014 7:42:03 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What “Highway Trust Fund”?


4 posted on 07/07/2014 7:42:14 AM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I want to raise the gas tax in exchange for getting rid of prevailing wage rule on road projects.

We need better roads (let’s tax). We need cheaper better roads (get rid of prevailing wages).

Seriously, an 18 cent a gallon tax amounts to about 1/2 cent per mile driven for your average sedan.

Inflation has made 18 cents too small a tax combined with the fact that most sedans (Malibu, Accord, Camry, Fusion) get better than 30 mpg highway.


5 posted on 07/07/2014 7:42:54 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Money in the “highway trust fund” being spent on non-highway things is what causes the “trust fund” to run out of money.

Never, ever approve another tax. Never. It’s not needed.

What’s needed is some accountability wrt how the money is spent. At one time in America, an outfit called “The House of Representatives” represented tax payers and provided oversight on spending.

But that idea is soooo 1950s,


6 posted on 07/07/2014 7:45:08 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

“Aren’t those fuel efficient cars supposed to be lighter, therefore wear much less on the roads?”

No , closer tolerances in manufacturing, direct injection engines combined with computer control of valve timing, spark ignition and air/fuel mix have made for an incredibly efficent vehicle that sill weighs in at 3000 lbs.


7 posted on 07/07/2014 7:45:19 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

vehicles getting more efficient fuel mileage or the congress stealing from the highway tax funds to use on pet projects to help them get reelected? I’d say the latter. Also factor in the 94 million unemployed who can’t afford to buy fuel.


8 posted on 07/07/2014 7:45:31 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; 2ndDivisionVet
This is all about buying votes and paying off your pals.

We have more than enough money to pay of the highways if we got rid of all the things you listed and more.

Ditto with the "Sequestration" we have 2,856 other things to cut (like Frog Statues or some study of California Grape Genes funded by the Air Force or Health and Human services) before we "have to make cuts in the children lunch programs" or scare monger everyone that our Veterans would go without Healthcare, which apparently they do already.

It's all a game and our money is the pawns! >:(

9 posted on 07/07/2014 7:46:31 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The states rape that fund and have their own tax besides. In NYS, we get scr**** royally as the tax is on the dollar not on the gallon. NYS never had so much money in their road programs....and still the roads are cr**.


10 posted on 07/07/2014 7:46:44 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

A couple years back, good ole NYS approved (IIRC) 95 new taxes.


11 posted on 07/07/2014 7:47:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If this Government didn’t misspend this money on other Non-Highway projects they would have plenty in the fund now.But they go out and waste it on Railroads, Airports,Etc.That already.

So they’re stealing from drivers to support all of these non-Highway projects.


12 posted on 07/07/2014 7:48:15 AM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

That sounds reasonable. Until you realize you cannot trust our rulers to spend the increased tax on roads. In fact I can pretty much guarantee they won’t.


13 posted on 07/07/2014 7:48:33 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just more unintended consequences of the do-gooder nanny state and their constant quest to control every aspect of our lives 24x7.


14 posted on 07/07/2014 7:48:44 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

The weight of the average car produces very little highway wear. I read once that one fully loaded 18 wheeler causes nearly 10,000 times the damage of one passenger car.


15 posted on 07/07/2014 7:48:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
More Fuel Efficient Cars Causing Highway Trust Fund to Go Broke

I can see how more efficient cars would reduce money flowing to the Highway Trust Fund.

I can also see how borrowing (stealing) Highway Trust Funds would cause the Highway Trust Fund to go broke far sooner than less destructive light weight fuel efficient cars.

16 posted on 07/07/2014 7:49:50 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cars are much heavier because of safety regulations and more fuel efficient because of environmental regulations. Just another unanticipated consequence of the liberal agenda.


17 posted on 07/07/2014 7:51:50 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

“Inflation has made 18 cents too small a tax combined with the fact that most sedans (Malibu, Accord, Camry, Fusion) get better than 30 mpg highway.”

But the fact remains that not all the money is spent on highways. Congress siphons of a huge amount and spends it on bike paths, greenways, public transportation, and a whole host of other non-highway related projects. When they spend it ALL on highways instead of pet projects, THEN we’ll talk about raising the gasoline tax.


18 posted on 07/07/2014 7:52:48 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
So us passenger car drivers are paying for the wear and tear caused by heavy 18-wheelers.
Yea I read somewhere that the road wear goes up by the fourth power of the axle weight or some such.

19 posted on 07/07/2014 7:55:13 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Nearly a million dollars to repave a stretch of bike path through the hood in the city near me. The amazing thing is that the one opposing voice was the city councilman representing the core of that ward. He said it wasn’t a priority and its been nothing but trouble by becoming a highway for crack heads, criminals, hookers and child molesters.


20 posted on 07/07/2014 7:55:16 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson