Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quesney
It’s not your private property. It’s not “yours”. It’s a government entitlement that is as hollow a promise as every other political promise that’s going to go belly up as the US economy continues to decline and the government runs out of other people’s money.

I still object to it being lumped in with the welfare herd. I have been paying into Social Security since I was 14, and I'm a great-grandpa now (still not retired). With the boom/bust cycles in my industry over the decades, the money I paid into Social Security is as much as I have been able to set aside for retirement (and keep there).

I have paid more in income taxes in just the last 5 years than that amount (well over), so count that, too. Somehow, the stigma of "entitlement" doesn't fit. It isn't like I was some illegal who popped up to draw benefits--I've been paying in for half a century.

25 posted on 07/04/2014 2:59:58 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

From a legal standpoint, quesney is correct. There are no private property rights attached to Social Security. But you are correct as far as perception goes. Everyone who worked in the private sector paid in to it. Therefore it isn’t “welfare.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flemming_v._Nestor


28 posted on 07/04/2014 3:04:44 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe


I still object to it being lumped in with the welfare herd. I have been paying into Social Security since I was 14, and I’m a great-grandpa now (still not retired). With the boom/bust cycles in my industry over the decades, the money I paid into Social Security is as much as I have been able to set aside for retirement (and keep there).

I have paid more in income taxes in just the last 5 years than that amount (well over), so count that, too. Somehow, the stigma of “entitlement” doesn’t fit. It isn’t like I was some illegal who popped up to draw benefits—I’ve been paying in for half a century.[/i]


Please don’t misunderstand me, and I don’t think you do, but just to make sure I’m clear: I’m not talking about what’s right/deserved. I’m talking about reality. The reality is, from a purely financial perspective, there is no “pension fund”. There is no savings safebox where everything you contributed has been held. It’s all been spent.

The money being paid to social security beneficiaries comes out of general tax revenue paid by an ever-shrinking number of ever-poorer, ever-more-burdened (on average) working taxpayers. From a pure, financial-reality perspective, it’s a government benefit and, politically, will be treated as such. The government is using other people’s money to pay your benefits. It’s not drawing on any secured stash of your past contributions - those contributions are all gone.

Government benefits are government spending paid for tax revenue from current taxpayers (and borrowing).

The time to argue about that is long past, after years of government spending more or taxing less and saving less than it should have and never treating your contributions as your property in the first place.

Is it right, no? Is it reality, yes. Is it going to get uglier, absolutely. Brace yourself.


32 posted on 07/04/2014 3:38:42 AM PDT by quesney (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

“Somehow, the stigma of “entitlement” doesn’t fit. It isn’t like I was some illegal who popped up to draw benefits—I’ve been paying in for half a century.”

I agree with you.

You were forced to pay into it, as I was.

The problem is that the money you paid was never saved, and people that never paid are getting SS as well.

It is bankrupt.

So it is a touchy subject with the younger set because they know they will not get their money back. Nor do many of those getting it soon that paid in at the max rate. It is extremely socialized, so the only ones that benefit are either ones who never paid in or were low wage earners.

It makes the rest of us mad. As socialism does to any one with a work ethic or sense of fairness.


156 posted on 07/04/2014 4:06:08 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

Smoke it Joe, I am on your side! Social Security is NOT an entitlement. It is a right...You and I each paid for our own Social Security that is coming due now!


183 posted on 07/04/2014 7:35:00 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

I agree with you. However, social security has always been an elaborate Ponzi scheme relying on the “full faith and credit” of the US. Social security was originally intended as a safety net, not as broad as it has now become. If anyone should get it, you should, but it is weak and getting weaker because it is a huge govt obligation being paid on a current basis by a smaller and smaller workforce. And unlike you, most people will not have paid into social security as much as they get out of it and I will either get very little, or spend it for heavily inflated expenses/devalued dollar, or both.


232 posted on 07/05/2014 1:14:56 PM PDT by Wicket (1 Peter 3:15 , Romans 5:5-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson