Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Emil Henry campaigned for Romney in 2012. He is now writing Romney would have a good chance to get the Republican nomination in 2016. It appears that Romney will run in 2016.
1 posted on 07/03/2014 4:13:13 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

I look forward to the expression on his face when he loses a third time.


2 posted on 07/03/2014 4:15:48 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Like Pollutico wants a Republican President.


3 posted on 07/03/2014 4:17:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

In 2012, the Republican voters made it clear that Romney was athe last choice in a field of vulnerable candidates. Normally, I wouldn’t expect a serious 3rd party run, but this is a very good way to invite one.


7 posted on 07/03/2014 4:21:37 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Mitt Romney set out early to create a vacuum for the 2008 primary, he pulled some early fund raising stunts that locked up some big money and announced that he would invest a large portion of his personal fortune, this kept out any serious competitors, and then of course it was even easier for him to pull that off for 2012.

There won’t be a vacuum in 2016, that primary will be full of heavy hitters, it will be a battle between the Reagan/Palin wing and the Rockefeller/Romney wing, Romney is not big enough to play with the big boys and never was.


8 posted on 07/03/2014 4:22:55 PM PDT by ansel12 (( Rand Paul---What a tragedy if America wouldn't have gotten to see Barack Obama as a leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

This is utterly ridiculous! Romnay, after the last election and by his own admission, stated he had no desire to serve as president. He ran because he was pressured to do so. Let’s find someone who wants the job!


9 posted on 07/03/2014 4:28:31 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

10 posted on 07/03/2014 4:29:30 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
Is Romney a masochist? Does he like pain?

Or, is he a sadist? Does he like to watch us suffer because of his campaigns?

Or, both?

11 posted on 07/03/2014 4:30:01 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

He is not the de facto leader of the republican party.

He is a gutter urchin and if I have blow money to defeat that A-hole, to get to a candidate who is acceptable, for damn’d sure I’ll do it.

K C U F Mitt Romney. ...

Putz...


14 posted on 07/03/2014 4:32:28 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

No, no, no. I don’t regret not supporting him last time, and I foresee more lack of support in my future. Though I will admit, the place was more delusion-filled when the Romneybots were around, and was therefore more entertaining.


16 posted on 07/03/2014 4:33:39 PM PDT by arderkrag (Chaste women, sober men, obedient children, and "sin laws" - the four horsemen of the apocalypse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

There’s an equivalently strong case for me to wash the three dishes stacked up in my sink. The difference would be that the result would be a positive.


17 posted on 07/03/2014 4:35:29 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Heck, no.

Sounds like the political consultants want to pick his pockets again.


18 posted on 07/03/2014 4:38:37 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA......HA.


19 posted on 07/03/2014 4:39:11 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“Strong Case for Romney 2016 White House Run”

Please, no. I voted for Romney in 2012, and would do so again, given the choice between Mitt and the 4 more years of Obama we are now suffering. But 2016 is not going to be like 2012 or 2008. The young guns in the GOP are coming of age, and some of them are actual conservatives. We will almost surely have several far better choices than Mitt Romney.

I would accept Romney in a GOP administration. He’s got a lot of business smarts. Put him at the Fed or let him oversee an initiative involving privatization of inefficient government services. Something like that. But as the head of the GOP ticket in 2016? Not the guy we need, or should want, IMHO.


20 posted on 07/03/2014 4:48:24 PM PDT by DemforBush (Whoever double-crosses me and leaves me alive, he understands nothing about Tuco.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Romney has too much money and too little pride.


23 posted on 07/03/2014 5:03:38 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Hell no... Cruz/Palin, Cruz/Walker, Cruz/Carson, Cruz/Perry...please...


24 posted on 07/03/2014 5:19:56 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I actually think Willard may run. Ann Romney has said no but I’ll bet he wears her down. He is convinced the election was stolen in 2012 and it probably was. Even Bill Clinton said he thought Romney was going to win. Mitt wants another bite at the apple. So what is that going to do to Ted Cruz and Rick Perry? They are the only two guys that spark any interest in me.


29 posted on 07/03/2014 5:40:25 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

2012? I’m still wondering if he will run in 2008.


31 posted on 07/03/2014 5:51:37 PM PDT by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

There will plenty of Rino’s running for 2016, it will be boring and much like the 2012.

Unless we get some good people running, like Cruz, West, Palin, then we will have something to cheer about.

I can’t wait to see Cruz debate these Rino’s, that’s going to be exiting, he knows more about everything, than all the Rino’s combined.


32 posted on 07/03/2014 6:01:14 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Yeah, he has a good chance to to be nominated. Conservatives are as fractured today as we were then. Our failure to coalesce behind a candidate gave us Rommney. Conservatives are individualists. We are not inclined to flock or join a herd. Still, we have got to figure out who we can coalesce around earily and do so, or we will loose the country and probably the world.


36 posted on 07/03/2014 8:30:36 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
.

Romney - the Magic RINO:


Chihuahua Romney - the One and the Only "Magic RINO(TM)":


















Photobucket

















Liberal Republican Romney photo liberalrepublicanromney3.jpg




"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
 over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
 to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn't make any sense at all.""

--  President Ronald Reagan




.

42 posted on 07/04/2014 6:58:52 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson