What do you suppose are the chances that he was not even involved or at the location of the attack? Perhaps he has been bribed to “go through this”, knowing that no sufficient charges can be made. IIRC, this was all over the news for a couple days, not too long ago, when it would have been great for the 0bama WH and crew to have some diversions and successes in the MSM headlines.
He may be a wannabe who was on the periphery of the attack; one of the first looters.
I really didn't expect anybody to be brought in because of what the defense attorneys would discover and then turn it against the government—gun running to Turkey and the speculation that Hillary or the White House was supplying Stingers to the Libyan rebels.
I've also thought it possible that Assad, Iran or even the Russians may have hired this local group, through an intermediary, to knock out the gun running project being run out of the consulate and the annex.
Supposedly (FOX News) the indictment is written to suggest the conspiracy to attack the U.S. installations was all hatched and executed in a 24-hour period. This allows room to say the jihadists were motivated by the anti-Islam video.
It's a big can of worms which may mean, as you suggest, Holder has the whole thing wired.