Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado governor on pot legalization: 'It could've been a lot worse'
Yahoo News ^ | July 2, 2014 | Dylan Stableford

Posted on 07/02/2014 8:00:28 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom

ASPEN, Colo. — Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper is refusing to call the state's legalization of marijuana a success — mostly because he says that would send a bad message to kids.

"Talk about bad branding," Hickenlooper said during an interview with Yahoo News' Global Anchor Katie Couric at the Aspen Ideas Festival on Tuesday, six months after recreational pot use in the state was legalized. "We don't want kids slipping off the rails."

But the governor, who previously opposed legalization because he saw "so many risks," now readily admits that many of his fears surrounding the topic have gone unrealized: The state has not seen a giant spike in adult consumption or an uptick in pot-impaired drivers, there hasn't been an increase in marijuana trafficking to neighboring states, and while the black market for weed still exists, "it's been damaged."

And Hickenlooper estimates the state will reap between $60 million and $100 million in taxes from the marijuana industry this year, and $130 million in 2015.

Being pleased with the outcome of marijuana legalization in Colorado, however, doesn't mean there isn't room for improvement. "It could've been a lot worse," Hickenlooper said. "But we've got to do better."

Hickenlooper says he believes the rise in use of edible marijuana — which the state did not foresee — is problematic, especially for first-time users.

"The jury's still out on edibles," he said. "A brownie that has 10 doses, people say, 'It's legal, how bad can it be?'"

The state is currently working to "limit each donut, each cookie, to one dose," he added.

Another problem: Because marijuana is still considered illegal by the federal government, banks won't accept money from pot retailers, making the legal marijuana industry an all-cash business.

"If you want to encourage corruption, make sure it's an all-cash business," Hickenlooper said, adding that the state is working to create an entity to address this issue, but it's still 12 to 18 months away.

More than any other concern surrounding the industry, though, the governor says he's worried about the negative effect that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC — the active ingredient in marijuana — can have on a young user's brain. So Hickenlooper's office is working on a campaign to warn those under 21 about the unknown risks associated with marijuana use. The slogan? "Don't Be a Lab Rat," replete with fake rats in metal cages posted at bus stops.

The governor dismissed the notion that such a campaign, coupled with legalization, is sending a mixed message to children.

"Kids have been getting a permissive vibe for years," Hickenlooper said.

Legalization, he said, is "one of the great social experiments of this century."

"Let's face it, the war on drugs was a disaster," he added.

Not that he's partaking in legal marijuana himself.

"No," Hickenlooper said. "As people in my office say, 'We don't need help making ourselves a little dumb.'"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cannabis; libertarian; marijuana; pot; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2014 8:00:28 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Big Government apparatchiks are never inclined to consider increased freedom to be a “success”.


2 posted on 07/02/2014 8:02:59 AM PDT by koanhead (If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

The Pot Heads don’t want to pay the tax


3 posted on 07/02/2014 8:03:58 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Not that he’s partaking in legal marijuana himself.

“No,” Hickenlooper said. “As people in my office say, ‘We don’t need help making ourselves a little dumb.’”

_____________________________________________________

Its OK to profit from the dumb citizens you’re elected to serve, just as long as you yourself aren’t as dumb as they are, right?


4 posted on 07/02/2014 8:04:16 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209
The Pot Heads don’t want to pay the tax

Where's the evidence they're evading taxes any more than anyone else?

5 posted on 07/02/2014 8:05:23 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: koanhead

On the contrary - this “increased freedom” means more “dumb” citizens and higher taxes/more spending.

A libertarian wet dream.


6 posted on 07/02/2014 8:06:11 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Its OK to profit from the dumb citizens

Every state with alcohol taxes (which I believe is all 50) does it.

7 posted on 07/02/2014 8:06:20 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Don’t be a troll. Oh, sorry. You ARE a troll.

To compare alcohol with marijuana is ridiculous.


8 posted on 07/02/2014 8:08:32 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; koanhead
On the contrary - this “increased freedom” means more “dumb” citizens

Free citizens do all sorts of dumb and dumbening things. The "freedom" to do only what the government deems "smart" is no freedom at all.

and higher taxes/more spending.

So should marijuana (and alcohol) be untaxed?

9 posted on 07/02/2014 8:09:27 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Its OK to profit from the dumb citizens

Every state with alcohol taxes (which I believe is all 50) does it.

To compare alcohol with marijuana is ridiculous.

So are you claiming alcohol isn't taxed, or that it doesn't make one dumber?

10 posted on 07/02/2014 8:10:32 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

“And Hickenlooper estimates the state will reap between $60 million and $100 million in taxes from the marijuana industry this year, and $130 million in 2015. “

Colorado will go the way of Amsterdam with Oregon to follow. DOn’t think Idaho will because of the Mormons will allow it.

Twenty years from now you see the long term health effects of the drug with a tremendous increase in addiction and the social consequences that follow.


11 posted on 07/02/2014 8:10:58 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“To compare alcohol with marijuana is ridiculous”, yep you are RIGHT. We KNOW alcohol KILLS. The jury is still out on “Mary Jane”. And then YOU wonder WHY young people HATE HYPOCRITES!


12 posted on 07/02/2014 8:11:46 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Let’s face it, the war on drugs was a disaster,” he added.

Please explain.


13 posted on 07/02/2014 8:12:17 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: molson209

The Pot Heads don’t want to pay the tax

<><><><<><><

LOL.

Looks like the potheads loved paying the tax.

60-100 million dollars worth in 2014, 130 mil projected in 2015.


14 posted on 07/02/2014 8:15:21 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Colorado will go the way of Amsterdam with Oregon to follow.

We can only hope so - Amsterdam has a lower crime rate than most major American cities.

Twenty years from now you see the long term health effects of the drug

Alcohol and tobacco have long term health effects; what's the proper policy conclusion?

with a tremendous increase in addiction and the social consequences that follow.

Marijuana is less addictive than alcohol or tobacco.

15 posted on 07/02/2014 8:15:25 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom; JustSayNoToNannies; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson

Your pro-dope agenda. Your trolling drug threads. Your incessant questions designed to agitate.

They got you banned before there just say no....

You’re a retread who will be gone again soon.


16 posted on 07/02/2014 8:15:37 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom; JustSayNoToNannies; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson

Your pro-dope agenda. Your trolling drug threads. Your incessant questions designed to agitate.

They got you banned before there just say no....

You’re a retread who will be gone again soon.


17 posted on 07/02/2014 8:16:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom


18 posted on 07/02/2014 8:16:39 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The Obamas Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
So you have no reasoned support for your arguments. Got it.
19 posted on 07/02/2014 8:18:01 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Your incessant questions

Questions are bad only to those with no good answers.

20 posted on 07/02/2014 8:19:18 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson