“Democrats, meanwhile, were defiant. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that if the Supreme Court will not protect womens access to health care, then Democrats will.”
LOL
When did not wanting to pay for someone else’s (whatever) turn into “denying [them] access”? If I don’t want to pay for your lunch, am I guilty of trying to starve you?
this is exactly right--and having your boss pay for your birth control does just that--brings him into your bedroom... how can liberals not see this???????????????
>> A womans personal health decisions about choosing to use contraception and when to start a family should stay strictly between her and her doctor not her boss, said Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.)
Such abject foolishness. No one is interfering with a woman’s decision.
Good! Now sluts will have to be a little more responsible for their behavior!
Ever since Obama got elected, my view of the United States has changed. Now, whenever I look at a map of the U.S., I envision it as a skinned animal without arms - with Florida representing an outstretched leg and Maine representing the other.......that vision accurately depicts Washington D.C.’s role in the U.S. carcass.
"Have you ever *seen* a conniption?"
The left is going to say is that this is a very narrow decision that only affects a tiny fraction of closely-held businesses, and thus will only be a minor speedbump for Obamacare.
However, most people being “low information types” as they are, with luck we may be able to get them to remember one simple message - that is, “The Supreme Court voted that (some) companies don’t have to supply birth control”.
The fascists will be screaming for days. The party that will kill millions of unborn children are going nuts.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
And they are?