Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy destroyer conducts longest ever surface-air engagement with new SM-6 missiles
Defense Update ^ | Jun 28, 2014

Posted on 06/29/2014 9:19:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

During the underway period, John Paul Jones also conducted its first ballistic missile tracking exercise while simultaneously tracking two supersonic and two subsonic missile targets. This event fully demonstrated the capabilities of Aegis Baseline 9C and of John Paul Jones as the first Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) destroyer

Over the course of three days June 18-20, the crew of Guided-missile destroyer USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53) successfully engaged six targets off the coast of Southern California, firing a total of five missiles that included four Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) missiles and one Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) missile. One of these exercises, designated as NIFC-CA AS-02A, resulted in the longest surface-to-air engagement in naval history.

During the underway period, John Paul Jones also conducted its first ballistic missile tracking exercise while simultaneously tracking two supersonic and two subsonic missile targets. This event fully demonstrated the capabilities of Aegis Baseline 9C and of John Paul Jones as the first Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) destroyer.

DDG 53 is now ready to assume the role as the Navy’s Integrated Air and Missile Defense test ship, following a change of homeport to Pearl Harbor later this summer

The live-fire tests was part of the Baseline 9C Aegis Combat System during Combat Systems Ship’s Qualification Trials (CSSQT) and Naval Integrated Fire Control Counter Air (NIFC-CA) capability, preparing the missile destroyer for its new role as missile defense test ship.

Since 2012 the vessel went through combat systems modernization the BAE ship repair facility in San Diego, as part of the destroyer modernization program. Over the course of a year, John Paul Jones received new computing infrastructure, SPY-1D transmitter upgrades, and a multi-mission signal processor which comprises the Aegis Baseline 9C suite.

According to Cmdr. Andrew Thomson, the ship’s commanding officer, USS John Paul Jones is now ready to assume the role as the Navy’s Integrated Air and Missile Defense test ship, following a change of homeport to Pearl Harbor in Hawaii later this summer. In the coming years, John Paul Jones is expected to test newer and more advanced systems that will be used to defend the nation and U.S. and allied forces overseas.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: raytheon; sm6; standardmissile; usn

The Arleigh-Burke class guided-missile destroyer USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53) launches a Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) during a live-fire test of the ship’s aegis weapons system. Over the course of three days, the crew of John Paul Jones successfully engaged six targets, firing a total of five missiles that included four SM-6 models and one Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) model. Photo: US Navy

1 posted on 06/29/2014 9:19:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wow! But then, in my days, we could lock on seagulls.


2 posted on 06/29/2014 9:28:24 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Five missiles for six targets is quite impressive.


3 posted on 06/29/2014 9:35:56 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

SM-6 testing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KTxWoPTXRY

Aegis Ballistic Missile SM 3 (star wars) Takes Out Another Ballistic Missile Target
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4uRi2lh9w

Key to Missile Defense: Raytheons Factory of the Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldnn3VqbJnw


4 posted on 06/29/2014 9:40:03 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

5 posted on 06/29/2014 9:42:11 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Could it shoot them down? Tracking is different than locking on them and killing them. An old firecontrol technican sends.


6 posted on 06/29/2014 9:42:50 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Crap... Was this successful? If it was, it will be cut within a year.


7 posted on 06/29/2014 9:43:05 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

8 posted on 06/29/2014 9:43:44 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

It says they “successfully engaged six targets” and I’m pretty sure weddings were not in the mix, but these days you never know!


9 posted on 06/29/2014 9:46:53 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Chinese will be selling them on a street corner in about 3 weeks.


10 posted on 06/29/2014 10:03:15 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
... while simultaneously tracking two supersonic and two subsonic missile targets.

What's a supersonic missile target? How does it differ from a supersonic missile? Was it inbound towards the ship or just flying in the vicinity? Inquiring minds want to know.

11 posted on 06/29/2014 11:16:32 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
I noticed there was no mention of destroying the targets, just engaging and tracking.

Good point.

12 posted on 06/29/2014 11:22:27 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

If Hillary Clinton becomes president you can bet the Chinese will have this technology.


13 posted on 06/29/2014 12:01:06 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan
What's a supersonic missile target? How does it differ from a supersonic missile? Was it inbound towards the ship or just flying in the vicinity?

Fairly sure it was flying on offset course or crossing angle.

There have been accidents where drones/targets have hit ships when veering after being hit. This can cause a lot of damage with a subsonic missile, and would be catastrophic with a supersonic one.

As I remember with these sorts of targets, the only time they were programmed to come straight in as in a real attack was toward an unmanned barge with the testing defensive weapon mounted on it.

14 posted on 06/29/2014 4:15:16 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

Airborne targets are expensive. So are instrumented missiles. Often a test missile will be destroyed some time between A-Pole and endgame. That way the target lives to fight another day.


15 posted on 06/30/2014 6:05:09 AM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson