Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2014 10:14:30 AM PDT by lilyramone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lilyramone
The rulings weren't thrown in doubt, they were thrown out period.
2 posted on 06/27/2014 10:18:45 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

Check out this statement from the White House.

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2014/06/27/completely-delusional-w-h-claims-scotus-ruled-in-favor-of-obamas-recess-appointments-video/


3 posted on 06/27/2014 10:19:19 AM PDT by rocksblues (The Obama administration the most unlawful, corrupt administration in US history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

Shut this unconstitutional communist board down!


4 posted on 06/27/2014 10:20:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

I was wondering when the other shoe would drop on this.


5 posted on 06/27/2014 10:21:09 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

I find this highly amusing.


6 posted on 06/27/2014 10:23:27 AM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

was an order promulgated to have the illegal appointees refund their salaries and bonuses?


8 posted on 06/27/2014 10:28:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone

“How can we get around this ruling?”


9 posted on 06/27/2014 10:32:39 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone
You think this is a mess, imagine if they ever find out the anointed one is ineligible. But that may be all part of the plan.
10 posted on 06/27/2014 10:34:12 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone
BooHoo!

Lefties scrambling.
Need some popcorn.
I hope they film it and we get to see them all tumble out of a tiny car as they throw buckets filled with confetti and pretend like they're getting splashed with water.

13 posted on 06/27/2014 10:45:22 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone; All

As a side note about the NRLB mentioned in relalated threads, please consider the following. With the exception of the federal entities indicated by the Constitution’s Clauses 16 & 17 of Section 8 of Article I as examples, entities under the exclusive legislative control of Congress, the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate labor. Only the states, with their 10th Amendment-protected sovereign powers, can regulate intrastate labor issues, unless the states amend the Constitution to grant such power to the feds.

Also, consider that the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected bureaucrats like those running the NLRB and the EPA. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulator powers whether it wants it or not imo. And by delegating federal regulatory powers to non-elected federal bureaucrats like the NLRB (and the EPA), Congress is wrongly protecting the abuse of federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 referenced above. Otherwise, a president would probably never try such shenanigans in an election year.

So not only are the non-elected bureaucrats of the NLRB wrongly exercising federal regulatory powers, but the NLRB is regulating intrastate labor issues regardless that the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to address such issues.


14 posted on 06/27/2014 11:31:17 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lilyramone; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ..

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

15 posted on 06/28/2014 5:56:41 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson