Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allendale

“These submarines are meant to counter any ambitions the Chinese may have on Siberian resources.”

This is crazy. Construction began in 1993. I am guessing that design was begun before Reagan left office.

This thing was squarely aimed at the USA.

AND FURTHERMORE, if china wants siberia, china will not go 3000 miles OUT OF THEIR WAY to try a COMPLICATED AMPHIBIOUS LANDING when china SHARES A 2000 MILE LONG LAND BORDER WITH SIBERIA.

I MEAN ARE YOU NUTS.


16 posted on 06/23/2014 7:40:06 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: staytrue

Really? You think that if Eastern Siberia were the target of an invasion its coast and adjacent sea lanes would not be of critical and strategic importance importance? You think China would take what it wants, be secure in its conquest and leave Pacific Siberia in Russian control? That submarine and others like it would be critically important in controlling those sea lanes. Read Morrison and you’ll get at least a rudimentary understanding so you won’t embarrass yourself with absurd statements.


23 posted on 06/23/2014 9:19:59 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson