What the Hell kind of wording is that for a legal document?
No identification of who informed her of this or of their qualifications or knowledge to make such a judgment or accusation.
Doesn't even rise to the level of hearsay. Why would a judge even permit such drivel to go into a legal argument?
Spot on. We have attorneys like this in Chicago courtrooms, too. They’re not talented and don’t know the law. Instead, they court judges via lunches, dinners, “conferences”, sports tickets and donations. They don’t argue the facts or merits, they manipulate. Rulings are by friendship, not facts. I suspect the more we look the worse this case will get.
Corruption in government is universal. Hillary, our Chicago versions, and some third world attorney all have that in common.