SHA2 (Standard Hillary Answer #2): “What difference does it make?”
The hillabeast is a bimbo...a lying bimbo...a grifting lying bimbo...a grifting lying bimbo who was fired for what would a felony to we working folks (Watergate committee).
Really, I eagerly await the time when some brave press reporter would give that wench the extended finger she deserves.
How in the world do we let such untalented and dishonest folks who really cannot do anything useful become elected officials? (Oh, never mind...that’s the very definition of elected officials.)
Hillary Clinton and Ethics are two ships passing in the night - one in the Atlantic Ocean, the other in the Pacific.
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” - AKA the Bill Clinton Defense.
Any prosecutor worth his salt would move to strike such a hearsay, self serving affidavit as that. It would have no relevance and would probably violate most State rape-shield statutes.
According to another article on this subject, swillery was not “appointed” to defend the rapist. She volunteered to do it.
Reminded me of the Ira Einhorn case.
A continuation of the leftist war on women and children.
Maybe this is the genesis of the “nuts and sluts” defense.
For a minute there,I thought this might be a “realative”of Juanita Broaddrick??(”You Might Want To Put A Little Ice On That”)?????
I’ve seen plenty of people, even here on FR, who say that this is what a good lawyer does, defends the client to the max. I’m not a lawyer so have no concept of lying and getting the guilty “off” as an ethical and decent defense.
It wasn’t about right or wrong, it was about winning at all costs and this is the motto of the rat party to this day.
Hillary has some nerve claiming the Bible is her favorite book - I don’t see a conscience there - just a lifetime of being an arrogant power hungry witch.
It is no surprise...Hillary threatened the women her husband the pervert raped telling them they would be ruined if they opened their mouth about her rapist husband...
It don’t matter s long as I get my Hillary check and free Hillary phone!
Sarc/off
Not to mention that the defendant at the time of the rape was 12 years old! To make an allegation that she was already pretty “skilled” as a 12 year old should have been thrown out by the judge, and the defense should have been given a look at that so-called evidence. Sounds like this whole case was a Hillary promotion. I realize that the lawyer wants to win every case, regardless of the guilt of the client, but it is cases just like these that have put sex offenders back on the streets to rape other 12 year olds. Once a perp has been given a soft sentence, they tend to feel that nothing is going to really stop them. This case needs to get wings.
Is this another of those attempts by the Clintons to get the bad stuff out there way ahead of time so that when the time is right, they can claim it is “old news”?
I wish the RNC had to guts to put this double victim in a TV advertisement against Hillary.
In the business world, I quickly learned that wherever and whenever someone uses the passive tense, they are either avoiding responsibility or lying.