“The entire country except for a few truly remote areas could be wired up to cable but they are content to control their little territories and keep the competition out.”
Apparently someone forgot to pay off our developers ...
We have coax, phone line and fiber-optics to our house.
More non-sequitur and straw man.
Try to refute in context One more time most areas not in large cities. Again you are arguing Apples and Prime Rib.
Its clear you have no concept of the issue you just rattle on and on figuring if you repeat it often enough it will eventually be true.
Also try to refute in context (so you don't look so much the fool) You selected this bit: “The entire country except for a few truly remote areas could be wired up to cable but they are content to control their little territories and keep the competition out.” and then posted the above as a supposed in context reply.
The problem is you removed it from the context Here is the full text in context: "As I've stated over and over and you have yet to refute Cable Companies have no Cable Company Competition in most areas because the have paid for such through lobbying money. The entire country except for a few truly remote areas could be wired up to cable but they are content to control their little territories and keep the competition out."
Then you reply with:
Apparently someone forgot to pay off our developers ... We have coax, phone line and fiber-optics to our house.
As we see total Non-sequitur...
You are trying to refute my premise by replying with a nonsensical answer that uses out of context parameters.