1 posted on
06/18/2014 6:45:43 AM PDT by
Biggirl
To: Biggirl
How will they be able to explain in court...with a straight face....that this guy they dragged in....was part of some conspiracy. I mean...we’ve all been told...it was just a plain old riot that occurred “all-of-a-sudden”. What judge is going to accept some prosecution team bringing in a guy on some charge like this?
To: Biggirl
His defense attorney will say that he never saw the video and knows nothing about it and therefore could not have been involved in an attack that was motivated by it.
To: Biggirl
And the timing of the arrest is so convenient, isn't it?
4 posted on
06/18/2014 6:52:13 AM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: Biggirl
And WE Know what his “Defense”will be?”The Video Made me Do It”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Biggirl
In my life I’ve never seen such corruption OF ANY GOVERNMENT! These people are evil!
7 posted on
06/18/2014 6:55:40 AM PDT by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: Biggirl
Recommend SHOEBAT.COM Great information. Will show you who made the Video. Connects lots of dots.
To: Biggirl
Is that the muzzie film maker who worked for eric holder?
10 posted on
06/18/2014 7:19:38 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: Biggirl
and now he’s on a slow boat to DC ,so they can drag this out as long as possible
11 posted on
06/18/2014 8:16:01 AM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Biggirl
The Fox News Radio readerette said yesterday it “wasn’t clear whether the suspect has been read his Miranda rights.”
WTF? Foreign terrorists now have Miranda rights? I thought that was an American law to protect American citizens.
12 posted on
06/18/2014 8:18:09 AM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Biggirl
NOW DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?
"INNOCENCE OF MUSLIMS" was the 'offensive YouTube video' that Hussein LIED ABOUT, claiming it triggered the Benghazi attack.
But now we learn (via Walid Shoebat) that the filmmaker was a US government MOSLEM operative creating agitprop for CGI/Stanley, a US government front company.
Remember how the actors told the media, "We didn't say those lines in the video. That wasn't our dialogue or the plotline, so we don't know why the Director turned our little movie into that anti-muslim storyline."
ANSWER = Because the 'Director' was an agitprop muslim working for the US government to CRIMINALIZE ANY SPEECH AGAINST MUSLIMS.
The actors were confused b/c their 'dialog' never mattered! They were given lines to speak on camera, without knowing the CIA was going to OVERDUB THEIR LINES with different anti-muslim speech in VARIOUS LANGUAGES depending on which countries they were targeting with this "Muslims are victims" tool.
WALID SHOEBAT article CLICK HERE
14 posted on
06/18/2014 8:31:14 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: Biggirl
15 posted on
06/18/2014 8:32:20 AM PDT by
soozla
(Truth prevails, regardless of who is willing to accept it – now, or later.)
To: Biggirl
How do you know that he is a Benghazi terrorists?
17 posted on
06/18/2014 8:36:21 AM PDT by
sport
To: Biggirl
The reason is so simple, this caveman can explain it: the filmmaker worked for Eric Holder, so Eric had his address and contact info. The Bengahzi murderers work for the Mooseslime brotherhood, little barry abstard boy’s friends; little barry bastard is so out of touch that he could not find the contact info on this slimooslim.
18 posted on
06/18/2014 8:38:51 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson